9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal to consider additional grounds on vires of section 34(1)(c) of the Estate Duty Act. 2. Eligibility for exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act regarding the valuation of a residential house. Analysis: Issue 1: Jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal The case involved an estate duty assessment on the death of an individual who had an interest in joint family properties. The Appellate Controller initially reduced the value of the residential house and directed the exclusion of two-thirds of the value representing the share of lineal descendants. The accountable person appealed, and the Tribunal accepted the claim, adjusting the value of the residential house based on a valuer's report. The accountable person raised an additional ground regarding the vires of section 34(1)(c) of the Estate Duty Act, citing a previous judgment. The Tribunal rejected this ground, stating it had no jurisdiction to deal with the matter. However, the High Court held that as the vires of section 34(1)(c) had been declared ultra vires by a previous decision, the Tribunal should have considered the additional ground in light of that decision. The High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the additional ground based on the previous judgment, ruling in favor of the accountable person. Issue 2: Eligibility for Exemption under Section 33(1)(n) Regarding the eligibility for exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act, the High Court referred to a previous case where the interpretation of the section was discussed. The section provides an exemption for a residential house used exclusively by the deceased for his residence. The High Court emphasized the need to determine the value of the deceased's share in the property to ascertain eligibility for the exemption. If the value of the deceased's share exceeded a specified amount, only that amount would be eligible for exemption. The High Court directed the Tribunal to consider the exemption in line with the principles outlined in the previous case, emphasizing the importance of accurately valuing the residential property to determine the extent of the exemption. The High Court answered the second question by providing guidance on how the exemption under section 33(1)(n) should be computed based on the value of the deceased's share in the property. In conclusion, the High Court's judgment addressed the jurisdiction of the Tribunal in considering additional grounds related to the vires of a statutory provision and provided guidance on the eligibility for exemption under a specific section of the Estate Duty Act concerning the valuation of a residential property.
|
