Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2018 (7) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (7) TMI 1494 - AAR - GST


Issues:
1. Classification and HSN code for frozen meat sold in packaged form.
2. Rate of tax on frozen meat sold by the company.

Issue 1: Classification and HSN Code for Frozen Meat:
The applicant, a supplier of frozen sheep/goat meat, sought an advance ruling on the classification and HSN code for their product. The Deputy Excise & Taxation Commissioner opined that the frozen meat packed in LDPE bags qualifies as supply of goods in a unit container attracting 12% GST. However, the applicant contested this, arguing that their packaging does not meet the definition of a unit container as per relevant notifications. The authority analyzed the GST rates applicable from July 2017 to November 2017 and from November 2017 onwards for products like sheep meat. They delved into the definitions of unit container and cited case laws to support their decision. The authority ruled that the applicant's packaging method does not constitute a unit container, thus falling under exemption lists specified in the notifications.

Issue 2: Rate of Tax on Frozen Meat:
Regarding the rate of tax on frozen meat sold by the company, the authority determined that the product, which does not qualify as being put up in a unit container, falls under the exemption list as per specific notifications. The ruling specified that the whole frozen animal carcass, packed in LDPE bags without weight indication, and further packed in HDPE bags with varying total weight details, supplied to the Army, does not meet the criteria of a product put up in a unit container. Consequently, the product was deemed exempt from GST based on the entries in the notifications applicable during the relevant periods.

In conclusion, the Authority for Advance Rulings Haryana addressed the issues raised by the applicant regarding the classification and tax rate on frozen meat sold in packaged form. By analyzing the definitions, notifications, and case laws, the authority ruled that the applicant's packaging method did not constitute a unit container, leading to the product falling under specific exemption lists. The detailed analysis and ruling provide clarity on the tax implications for the company's frozen meat supply operations.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates