9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the expenditure incurred by the company on the entertainment of customers and clients was in the nature of entertainment expenditure within the meaning of section 37(2) of the Act. 2. Whether the Abohar Ginning Unit was entitled to exemption u/s 84 of the I.T. Act, 1961. 3. Whether one-half of the profits of the previous years should be added to the capital computation for purposes of calculating the relief u/s 84. 4. Whether the ITO was justified in estimating the annual letting value of the premises at Rs. 96,000 notwithstanding the rent of Rs. 27,462 received from Modi Industries Ltd. Summary: Issue 1: Entertainment Expenditure u/s 37(2) The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 7,016 as entertainment expenditure incurred on customers, merchants, and agents, following the precedent set in Brij Raman Dass & Sons v. CIT [1976] 104 ITR 541. The court agreed with the Tribunal's view that this amount falls within the scope of s. 37(2) of the I.T. Act, 1961. Issue 2: Exemption u/s 84 for Abohar Ginning Unit The Tribunal found that the Abohar Ginning Unit was a separate and economically viable unit, not formed by the reconstruction of an existing business. It was entitled to relief under s. 84 of the Act. The court supported this view, citing the Supreme Court decision in Textile Machinery Corporation Ltd. v. CIT [1977] 107 ITR 195 (SC), which emphasized that a new industrial undertaking must be distinct and separate from the existing business. Issue 3: Addition of Profits to Capital Computation u/s 84 The Tribunal accepted the assessee's claim to include one-half of the profits in the capital computation for the purpose of rebate u/s 84, as per r. 19(5) of the I.T. Rules, 1962. The court agreed, referencing the decision in Addl. CIT v. Hind Lamps (P.) Ltd. [1977] 106 ITR 360, which held that profits derived from a new undertaking should be included in determining the capital employed. Issue 4: Estimation of Annual Letting Value The Tribunal reduced the annual letting value from Rs. 44,209 to Rs. 27,432, the actual rent received from Modi Industries Ltd., as it was deemed fair and reasonable under the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act (U.P. Act 3 of 1947). The court agreed, noting that the actual rent received should be regarded as the fair annual letting value when the property is subject to rent control limitations and there is no evidence to suggest the agreed rent is not fair and reasonable. Conclusion: 1. Against the assessee and in favor of the department. 2. In the affirmative, in favor of the assessee and against the department. 3. In the affirmative, in favor of the assessee and against the department. 4. In the negative, in favor of the assessee and against the department. The parties were directed to bear their own costs due to divided success.
|
