Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAAR GST - 2018 (12) TMI AAAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (12) TMI 1276 - AAAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Timeliness of the appeal filing.
2. Classification of the "Mridaparikshak Minilab for Agriculture Soil Testing."
3. Classification of the Refill Reagents.
4. Applicability of the exemption under Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28-6-2017.

Detailed Analysis:

I. Timeliness of the Appeal Filing:
The appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit. The impugned order dated 30-05-2018 was received by the appellant on 02-06-2018, and the appeal was filed on 21-06-2018, which is within the 30-day limit as per Section 100 (2) of the TGST Act, 2017.

II. Classification of the "Mridaparikshak Minilab for Agriculture Soil Testing":
1. Appellant's Claim: The appellant argued that the Minilab should be classified under Heading 8201 as "Agricultural implements manually operated or animal driven" per Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate), Entry No. 137.
2. Lower Authority's Ruling: The Adv. Ruling Authority classified the Minilab under Heading 9027, which pertains to "Instruments and apparatus for physical or chemical analysis."
3. Appellate Authority's Analysis:
- Nature and Usage: The Minilab is an electronic instrument used for determining various soil parameters such as soil pH, Electrical Conductivity, Organic Carbon, etc., through chemical analysis.
- Interpretation of Tariff Headings: The Heading 8201 covers hand tools used in agriculture, which are manually operated. The Minilab, being an electronic instrument, does not fit this category.
- Application of Ejusdem Generis: The phrase "other tools of a kind used in agriculture" in Heading 8201 should be interpreted in the context of the specific items listed, all of which are hand tools.
- Conclusion: The Minilab is not classifiable under Heading 8201 but under Heading 9027, as it is an instrument for chemical analysis.

III. Classification of the Refill Reagents:
1. Appellant's Claim: The appellant sought classification of Refill Reagents under Heading 8201.
2. Lower Authority's Ruling: The Adv. Ruling Authority classified the Refill Reagents under Heading 9027, as they are parts and accessories for the Minilab.
3. Appellate Authority's Analysis:
- Nature of Refill Reagents: The Refill Reagents are chemicals used in the Minilab for soil analysis and are identified only by numbers (Reagent 1 to 42).
- Application of Chapter Notes: Note 2(b) to Chapter 90 specifies that parts and accessories suitable for use solely or principally with an instrument of Heading 9027 should be classified under the same heading.
- Conclusion: The Refill Reagents are accessories to the Minilab and are correctly classified under Heading 9027.

IV. Applicability of the Exemption under Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate):
1. Appellant's Claim: The appellant claimed that the Minilab and Refill Reagents should be exempt under Entry No. 137 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate).
2. Appellate Authority's Analysis:
- Exemption Criteria: The exemption applies to "Agricultural implements manually operated or animal driven" under Heading 8201.
- Classification Outcome: Since the Minilab and Refill Reagents are classified under Heading 9027, they do not fall under the specified exemption criteria.
- Conclusion: The impugned goods are not eligible for the exemption under Entry No. 137 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

Conclusion:
The Appellate Authority upheld the Adv. Ruling Authority's decision, confirming the classification of the "Mridaparikshak Minilab for Agriculture Soil Testing" and the Refill Reagents under Heading 9027, and ruled that they are not eligible for the exemption under Entry No. 137 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The appeal was disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates