9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Jurisdiction of Appellate Assistant Commissioner to direct consideration of exclusion of sum in reassessment. Analysis: The case involved a dispute regarding the jurisdiction of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) to direct the Wealth-tax Officer (WTO) to consider the exclusion of a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs in the reassessment for the assessment year 1959-60. The assessee, a company, initially declared a net wealth of Rs. 56,38,190, including the sum of Rs. 5 lakhs representing shares of a company. Subsequently, during reassessment, the WTO added the sum of Rs. 5 lakhs to the net wealth, which was contested by the assessee before the AAC. In the reassessment proceedings, the assessee requested the exclusion of the sum of Rs. 5 lakhs, arguing it should be exempt under specific provisions of the Wealth Tax Act. The AAC directed the WTO to reconsider the inclusion of the disputed amounts, considering the complexity of the issues involved and the need for further verification. The AAC set aside the assessment to allow the WTO to verify the submissions and give the appellant an opportunity to be heard on the matter. The matter was then taken to the Tribunal, where the revenue contended that the AAC had no jurisdiction to direct the consideration of the sum of Rs. 5 lakhs for exclusion in reassessment, as it had already been included in the original assessment. The Tribunal, however, rejected this contention, emphasizing the difference in language between the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and the Wealth Tax Act. It held that the correctness of a deduction not given in the original assessment could be considered in reassessment under the Wealth Tax Act. The High Court, following a decision of the Kerala High Court, ruled that in reassessment proceedings, the taxing authority cannot reconsider items already included in the original assessment. The Court held that the sum of Rs. 5 lakhs, having been included in the original assessment, could not be excluded in the reassessment. Therefore, the question was answered in the negative, in favor of the revenue. The judgment highlighted the limited scope of reassessment under the Wealth Tax Act, emphasizing that once an item is included in the original assessment, it cannot be reconsidered for exclusion in reassessment proceedings. The decision underscored the importance of following established conventions in interpreting tax laws and ensuring consistency in legal principles across different High Courts.
|
