9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (4) TMI 677 - AT - Income TaxAddition towards gift - Sale of land - gift of shares and transactions relating to sale of land - Year of taxability - CIT (A) deleted the addition following the decision in the case of Krupeshbhai N Patel 2013 (4) TMI 922 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT - HELD THAT - transaction of transfer of land arose during Asst. Year 2009-10 and the impugned gift relating to Asst. Year 2008-09 - Addition of gift cannot be made in the A.Y. 2009-10. Decision in the case of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VERSUS KRUPESHBHAI N PATEL 2013 (4) TMI 922 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT followed. -. Also see SMT. LALITABEN NARHARI PATEL 2016 (5) TMI 217 - ITAT AHMEDABAD . According we do not find any infirmity in the order of CIT (A), accordingly, same is upheld. Consequently, the sole grounds of appeal of the revenue is therefore, dismissed.
Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition on account of gift received in kind by the assessee. 2. Taxability of the gift in the assessment year under consideration. Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Deletion of Addition on Account of Gift Received in Kind by the Assessee: The primary issue in this appeal is whether the addition of ?75,39,521/- on account of the gift received in kind by the assessee should be deleted. The Revenue contended that the learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts by deleting this addition. The assessee had shown to have accepted gifts in the form of equity shares of Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the gifts were from Shri Jayant Sanghavi, who was not related to the assessee, and the market value of these shares was ?75,39,521/-. The AO further noted that the donor's wife entered into a land purchase transaction, and the total consideration included the value of the gifted shares. The AO concluded that the gifts were part of the undisclosed sale consideration for the land and added the value of the shares to the assessee's income. 2. Taxability of the Gift in the Assessment Year Under Consideration: The CIT(A) deleted the addition by examining the transactions in detail and concluded that the transfer of land arose during the Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10, whereas the gift related to AY 2008-09. Therefore, any addition related to the undervaluing of the land transaction should fall in AY 2009-10. The Tribunal noted that a similar issue had been decided in favor of the assessee in the case of another group member, Smt. Lalitaben N Patel, for AY 2008-09. The Tribunal had held that the gifts received in kind were part of the undisclosed sale consideration of Gotri land, which should be taxed in AY 2009-10 as per section 45(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) had followed this precedent and correctly concluded that the addition should not be made in AY 2008-09. The Tribunal also noted that the Revenue's appeal challenging this decision was dismissed by the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court, which held that no question of law arose in the present tax appeal by the Revenue. Conclusion: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, stating that the addition of ?75,39,521/- was not liable to be taxed in the assessment year under consideration. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. The Cross Objection filed by the assessee was also dismissed as infructuous since the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed. The order was pronounced in the open Court on 09.04.2019.
|
