Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2019 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (4) TMI 1118 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of 5% of the diesel costs.
2. Disallowance of interest expenses under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act.
3. Disallowance of expenditure on exempt income under section 14A of the Income Tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of 5% of the Diesel Costs:
The assessee company, engaged in the business of excavation, claimed expenses on machinery amounting to ?41,33,021/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) requested various documents, including log books and vouchers, which were not provided by the assessee. Consequently, the AO disallowed 5% of the total expenses due to the absence of necessary documentation, amounting to ?2,06,661/-. The CIT(Appeals) upheld this disallowance, stating that the assessee failed to produce required evidence. The Tribunal found the CIT(Appeals)'s decision reasonable and upheld the disallowance, noting the assessee's lack of vigilance in contesting the findings.

2. Disallowance of Interest Expenses under Section 40(a)(ia):
The AO disallowed interest expenses totaling ?6,36,018/- due to non-compliance with TDS provisions. The assessee argued that taxes paid before filing the income tax return should be allowable under section 43B. However, the CIT(Appeals) confirmed the AO's disallowance, emphasizing that the disallowance was made under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction and non-payment of TDS within the prescribed time. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)'s decision, noting that the assessee did not provide any evidence to refute the AO's findings.

3. Disallowance of Expenditure on Exempt Income under Section 14A:
The AO found that the assessee had invested ?60,00,000/- in shares to earn exempt income while claiming interest deductions on loans. The AO disallowed ?4,87,464/- under section 14A read with Rule 8D, as the assessee failed to demonstrate that no expenditure was incurred for earning the exempt income. The CIT(Appeals) upheld this disallowance, citing the assessee's inability to segregate the funds and the appropriateness of applying Rule 8D. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(Appeals), noting the assessee's non-vigilant attitude and confirming the disallowance.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the disallowances made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(Appeals) on all three grounds. The order was pronounced on April 16, 2019.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates