Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2019 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (7) TMI 106 - HC - Companies Law


Issues:
1. Application to direct Official Liquidator to release sale consideration amount.
2. Filing of counter affidavit by Official Liquidator.
3. Adjudication of claim by Official Liquidator.
4. Appeal against rejection of claim.
5. Direction to sell balance secured asset and entertain fresh claim.
6. Failure to make a fresh claim by the appellant.
7. Interpretation of Court's direction on adjudication of claim.
8. Disbursal of entitled amount to the appellant.
9. Liquidation process and necessary steps by Official Liquidator.

Analysis:
1. The application sought the Court's direction for the release of ?2.15 Crores received from the sale of Lot No.1 by the Official Liquidator, subject to the condition of depositing workmen dues as per Section 529-A of the Companies Act, 1956.

2. The Official Liquidator filed a counter affidavit requesting to accept the same and directed the applicant to file their claim afresh.

3. The applicant, M/s Tata Capital Ltd., initially claimed ?25,49,62,494/-, which was later adjudicated by the Official Liquidator. The claim was partially admitted to the extent of ?9,94,47,759/- with interest, and the remaining amount was rejected.

4. Aggrieved by the rejection, the applicant filed an appeal which was allowed by the Court, directing the Official Liquidator to sell the balance secured asset, entertain a fresh claim, and adjudicate it accordingly.

5. The failure of the appellant to make a fresh claim hindered the release of the amount by the Official Liquidator, as directed by the Court in the previous appeal judgment.

6. The Court clarified that the previous order did not intend to reinitiate the adjudication process but aimed at disbursing the entitled amount determined through the appeal judgment.

7. Consequently, the Court directed the Official Liquidator to take necessary steps for disbursal of the amount, noting that no other claimants needed adjudication, and the liquidation process should proceed with the required forms to be filed within two weeks.

8. The judgment emphasized the need for understanding the context and developments in interpreting the Court's directions for the disbursal of the entitled amount to the appellant, ensuring compliance with the legal procedures for liquidation.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates