Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1974 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1974 (1) TMI 15 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
Challenge to notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for assessment years 1961-62, 1963-64, and 1965-66 based on alleged illegal assumption of jurisdiction by the Income-tax Officer.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a company owning a colliery, challenged notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for three assessment years, claiming they were illegal and invalid. The notices were based on a report of underground measurement by mining officials of the Government of West Bengal. The petitioner had previously appealed against assessments for these years, with varying outcomes. The Income-tax Officer relied on information regarding under-reporting of coal raisings at the colliery to initiate proceedings under section 147(a) of the Act.

For the assessment year 1963-64, the Income-tax Officer's reasons for initiating proceedings included under-reporting of coal raising based on information from the Chief Mining Officer, West Bengal. The petitioner argued that it had no prior knowledge of the under-reporting and therefore did not fail to disclose relevant facts during the original assessment. The court referred to precedents emphasizing that the belief forming the basis for reopening assessments must be held in good faith and supported by rational reasons.

The court found that the Income-tax Officer had not conducted an independent inquiry but solely relied on the information provided by the mining authorities. As the petitioner had no knowledge of the under-reporting at the time of the original assessment, the court concluded that the proceedings under section 147(a) could not be initiated against the petitioner. Therefore, the court quashed the impugned notices and issued a writ of mandamus to cancel them.

In conclusion, the court made the rule absolute, quashed the impugned notices, and directed that any assessment orders made in pursuance of those notices be quashed as well. The court ordered the copy of the relevant letter and the Income-tax Officer's recorded reasons to be kept on record and marked as an exhibit "H," with a stay on the operation of the order for a fortnight.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates