9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (8) TMI 50 - AT - Income TaxPenalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - assessing the interest income as income from other sources - HELD THAT - Since the order of the Tribunal on which reliance has been placed by the ld. CIT(A) while disposing of the appeals filed by the assessee against levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act has been reversed by the Hon ble Allahabad High Court we set aside the consolidated order of the ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter to his file with a direction to decide the issue in the light of the order of the Hon ble Allahabad High Court 2017 (9) TMI 824 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT and after affording due opportunity of hearing to the assessee. - Appeals of the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the interest income earned on FDRs during the construction period of a project should be treated as a capital receipt or as income from other sources. 2. Whether the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by the CIT(A) was justified. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Treatment of Interest Income: The assessee company, a subsidiary of M/s Jaiprakash Power Ventures Ltd., was setting up a Thermal Power Project and earned interest income from short-term deposits with banks. The assessee treated this interest income as a capital receipt, reducing the project cost. However, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) assessed the interest income as 'income from other sources' under section 143(3) for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. The CIT(A) confirmed the A.O.'s assessment, but the Tribunal later deleted the additions, following the precedent set in the case of M/s Prayag Raj Power Corporation. The Tribunal held that the interest income earned before the commencement of business should be adjusted against the project cost, not taxed as 'income from other sources'. However, the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court reversed the Tribunal's decision, citing the Supreme Court judgment in Tuticorin Alkali Chemical and Fertilizers Ltd. vs. CIT, which held that interest income earned on borrowed funds before the commencement of business should be treated as 'income from other sources'. The High Court emphasized that the interest income had no immediate nexus with the business activities and should be taxable under section 56 of the Income-tax Act. 2. Deletion of Penalty under Section 271(1)(c): The A.O. initiated penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and levied penalties for both assessment years. The assessee appealed, and the CIT(A) deleted the penalties based on the Tribunal's earlier order, which had deleted the additions. The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order, arguing that the High Court had reversed the Tribunal's order, thus invalidating the basis for deleting the penalties. The assessee contended that the issue was debatable, and there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars as the interest income was disclosed in the financial statements. The Tribunal, considering the reversal by the High Court, set aside the CIT(A)'s order deleting the penalties. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) to decide afresh in light of the High Court's judgment and after providing an opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeals for statistical purposes, directing the CIT(A) to reconsider the penalty deletion in light of the High Court's decision, which affirmed that the interest income should be treated as 'income from other sources'. The Tribunal emphasized the need to align the penalty decision with the High Court's ruling, ensuring due process and opportunity for the assessee to present their case.
|
