HC allowed the appeal, setting aside ITAT's order rejecting ...

High Court Overturns Tax Tribunal's Decision, Mandates Comprehensive Review of Additional Evidence Under Rule 29

April 12, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

HC allowed the appeal, setting aside ITAT's order rejecting additional evidence under Rule 29. The court found ITAT committed a legal error by summarily dismissing the application without evaluating whether the documents were necessary for just and proper disposal of the appeal. The ruling emphasized that ITAT failed to consider the Supreme Court's established parameters for admitting additional evidence, particularly when such evidence was not previously presented before the Assessing Officer or Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Consequently, the HC remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing a comprehensive review of the additional documentary evidence.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC allowed the appeal, setting aside ITAT's order rejecting ...

High Court Overturns Tax Tribunal's Decision, Mandates Comprehensive Review of Additional Evidence Under Rule 29

April 12, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed several key issues. Firstly, on Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment, it found errors in the CIT(A)'s decision as rectification was only...

The NCLAT set aside the adjudicating authority's mechanical admission of a Section 95 application, finding a lack of independent assessment. The tribunal emphasized that...

Exemption from Tax - Classification of goods sold - emery cloth - unclassified item or not - tarpaulins - cotton fabrics or not - The Tribunal, after considering...

Power of Tribunal to review the judgment versus Power to re-call - Larger Bench (5 Members) decision - The judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court clearly lays down that...

Power to review versus Power to rectify - cancellation of GST registration - the appellate authority erroneously exercised its power under Section 161 of the Act. The...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's claims in multiple tax-related matters. Regarding Section 80G, the Tribunal upheld the deduction for Corporate Social Responsibility...

The ITAT held that where the assessee entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and complied with its...

Review petition - The tribunal dismissed the review application, stating it was not maintainable in the petitioner's personal capacity and lacked merit. It emphasized...

HC allowed the petition, finding a violation of natural justice due to lack of proper application of mind by the respondent authority under Section 74 of the Central...

Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

Condonation of delay in filing of Review Application - In view of the fact that Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to the Court / Tribunal whether the...

Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning,...

Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

Quick Updates: