9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Assessment of income tax, validity of Commissioner's order u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Assessment of income tax: The Commissioner of Income-tax found the assessment for the year 1968-69 to be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to non-disallowance of interest on capital not utilized for the firm's business but advanced to partners for property investment. The Commissioner issued a notice to the partners, who raised objections in a detailed written statement. However, the Commissioner did not address these objections but directed the Income-tax Officer to reframe the assessment after allowing the assessee to present evidence. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner failed to provide reasons or evidence for his conclusion of error, leading to the order being set aside. Validity of Commissioner's order u/s 263: The Tribunal observed that the Commissioner did not specify the basis for deeming the Income-tax Officer's order as prejudicial to revenue. The Commissioner's failure to justify his decision and address the objections raised by the assessee led to the Tribunal setting aside the order. The Tribunal's decision was based on the lack of proper reasoning and evidence provided by the Commissioner, highlighting the necessity for clear justification in such cases. The Tribunal's action was deemed justified in this context. Conclusion: The Tribunal's decision to set aside the Commissioner's order u/s 263 was upheld, as the Commissioner failed to provide adequate reasoning and evidence for deeming the original assessment as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The lack of justification and failure to address objections raised by the assessee led to the order being deemed improper. The Tribunal's decision was affirmed, and the specific question referred to the High Court was answered in the affirmative, without any order as to costs.
|
