Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2019 (9) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (9) TMI 695 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of royalty payments under "Licensing services for the right to use minerals."
2. Determination of GST liability on contributions to District Mineral Foundation (DMF) and National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET).

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Classification of Royalty Payments

Arguments by the Applicant:
- The applicant, engaged in mining and sale of rough diamonds, sought clarification on whether royalty paid for mining leases falls under "Licensing services for the right to use minerals" under heading 9973.
- The applicant argued that royalty is a periodic payment for the right to extract minerals and should be classified under SAC 997337, attracting GST at the same rate as applicable on the supply of like goods.
- The applicant cited various judicial decisions and sectoral FAQs to support their claim that royalty payments are for licensing services.

Authority's Findings:
- The supply made by the government (right to mine resources) is taxable under Section 9 of the Act and falls within the meaning of 'supply' as per Section 7.
- The royalty received by the government is deemed to be for business purposes and is taxable under reverse charge as per Sr. No. 5 of Notification No. 13/2017 - CT (Rate).
- The service provided by the government is classified under heading 997337, which includes licensing services for the right to use minerals including exploration and evaluation.

Ruling:
- The service by way of granting a license to extract minerals shall be classified under Tariff Heading 99733.

Issue 2: GST Liability on Contributions to DMF and NMET

Arguments by the Applicant:
- The applicant sought clarification on whether contributions to DMF and NMET, mandated by the MMDR Act, 1957, amount to "Supply" and are liable for GST under reverse charge.
- The applicant argued that these contributions are not in the course of business and do not constitute a supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act.
- The applicant contended that DMF and NMET are non-profit bodies and do not fall under the definition of "Government" or "local authority," thus not liable for GST under reverse charge.

Authority's Findings:
- The authority noted that contributions to DMF and NMET are part of the original supply of mining rights and are considered as additional royalty.
- As per Sections 9B and 9C of the MMDR Act, these contributions are in addition to the royalty and are thus treated as part of the original consideration for the supply of mining rights.
- The authority referenced Section 7 of the CGST Act, which defines 'supply' and noted that contributions to DMF and NMET are in respect of the mining rights and are therefore taxable under reverse charge.

Ruling:
- Contributions to DMF and NMET are considered additions to the royalty payable for the original supply of mining rights and are liable to be added to the value of the original supply for GST purposes.

Conclusion:
- The classification of royalty payments falls under Tariff Heading 99733.
- Contributions to DMF and NMET are treated as additional royalty and are taxable under reverse charge as part of the original supply of mining rights.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates