9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The issue involves the admissibility of a deduction for sales tax paid by the assessee in computing income for the assessment year 1962-63. Details of the Judgment: The assessee, a registered firm, had a partial partition of the Hindu undivided family in regard to the business, which was taken over by three members only. The business was carried on in the status of a firm. The sales tax liability of the family business was reduced by appeal, and an amount was paid in the financial year relevant to the assessment year 1962-63. The assessee claimed a deduction for this amount in the computation of profits, but it was disallowed by the Income-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. However, the Tribunal held that the sales tax paid was an allowable deduction as the firm had taken over the liability from the Hindu undivided family. The Tribunal found that the Hindu undivided family was following the mercantile system of accounting, and the sales tax liability was being claimed on the basis of estimates. As the assessee had taken over all assets and liabilities of the family, including the liability to pay sales tax, and had paid the amount in the relevant financial year, it was entitled to claim the deduction. The Tribunal referred to a case where a similar principle was applied regarding the accrual of liability in the year it was quantified finally. The High Court answered the question in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee, stating that the deduction for sales tax paid was allowable. The assessee was awarded costs and counsel's fee. This judgment clarifies the admissibility of deductions for sales tax paid by an assessee when following the mercantile system of accounting and when the liability is quantified and paid in the relevant financial year.
|
