Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2019 (12) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (12) TMI 463 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Admissibility of the Application
2. Classification of Products under HSN Codes
3. Submissions of the Applicant
4. Submissions of the Revenue
5. Observations and Findings of the Authority

1. Admissibility of the Application:
The Applicant, a manufacturer of confectionery products containing portions of cooked chicken, fish, or egg, seeks a ruling on whether the products listed in para 2 of Annexure B are classifiable under HSN 1601. The application is admissible under section 97(2)(a) of the GST Act for the classification of goods. The Applicant declares that the issue is not pending or decided in any proceedings under the GST Act, and the revenue officer has not objected to the admissibility. However, following the WBAAAR's caution in a previous case, this Authority limits the ruling to products that display common attributes and belong to a single category.

2. Classification of Products under HSN Codes:
The products are analyzed based on their cereal component, non-vegetarian component, and method of cooking. Most products are baked food preparations made of flour and contain chicken. The Applicant argues that these products, containing more than 20% by weight of chicken meat, should be classified under HSN 1601 instead of HSN 2106. The Applicant supports this with a test report confirming the chicken meat content.

3. Submissions of the Applicant:
The Applicant submits that the products have been classified under HSN 2106 but argues they should be under HSN 1601 due to the chicken meat content. The Applicant refers to a CESTAT decision in Venky’s Fast Food, supporting their argument that the products are preparations of meat and should be classified under HSN 1601.

4. Submissions of the Revenue:
The concerned officer from the Revenue has no comments apart from the admissibility of the Application.

5. Observations and Findings of the Authority:
Baked food preparations of flour are classifiable under HSN 1905, which includes bread, pastries, cakes, biscuits, and other bakers’ wares. However, Chapter Note I(a) to Chapter 19 excludes food preparations containing more than 20% by weight of sausage, meat, meat offal, fish, etc. These are included in Chapter 16, which states that the weight of meat should be considered at the stage when presented to the customer as foodstuff. The Applicant’s products, being preparations of meat with more than 20% by weight of chicken meat, should be classified under HSN 1601.

The decision in Venky’s Fast Food was based on the Excise Tariff Act before 2005, which included preparations of meat and fish. The current HSN 1601 specifies food preparations based on meat, excluding fish preparations. The CESTAT in Dodsal Corporation Pvt Ltd ruled that food preparations based on meat must have meat as the starting point. The Applicant’s products, where chicken meat is used as a filling and the baked product can survive without it, are not food preparations based on meat and cannot be classified under HSN 1601. However, products like Chicken Cutlet and Chicken Finger, which would not survive without chicken meat, may be classified under HSN 1601 if they contain more than 20% by weight of meat.

Ruling:
The Application is admitted for products that are baked food preparations made of flour and contain chicken, listed under Sl Nos 1 to 5 and 11 to 25. These products, where chicken meat is used as a filling and the baked product can survive without it, are not food preparations based on meat and cannot be classified under HSN 1601. Products that would not survive without chicken meat may be classified under HSN 1601 if they contain more than 20% by weight of meat. This Ruling is valid subject to the provisions under Section 103 until declared void under Section 104(1) of the GST Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates