9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Computation of income from house property where multiple owners exist. 2. Interpretation of section 23(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding statutory allowances for co-owners. 3. Application of section 26 in assessing income from jointly owned property. Analysis: The High Court of Calcutta was tasked with determining the method of computing income from a house property jointly owned by multiple individuals in specific shares. The case involved an assessee who owned an undivided one-third share in a property along with his brothers. The Income-tax Officer based the assessment on a previous year's valuation without detailed computation. The assessee proposed a method involving determining the annual value of the entire property and then calculating his share, claiming a reduction under section 23(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner disagreed with the assessee's approach, leading to an appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal favored the assessee's argument, emphasizing the ambiguity in the language of the Act regarding co-owners but supporting the computation suggested by the assessee. It highlighted the provisions of section 26, which indicated that each co-owner's share should be separately assessed based on their definite and ascertainable shares. The Tribunal acknowledged practical difficulties in computations but concluded that such issues would arise regardless of the method used by the revenue. The primary question referred to the High Court was whether the statutory allowance under section 23(2) should be separately allowed for each co-owner when computing income from house property. The Court delved into the Act's scheme, outlining sections 22 to 25 related to the taxability and computation of income from house property. It specifically analyzed section 26, which addressed property owned by co-owners with definite shares, emphasizing the inclusion of each person's share in their total income. The Court examined the interpretation of the Act, considering the notional income of the entire property versus the individual owner's income. It discussed the addition of an Explanation under section 26 through the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, which clarified that each co-owner should be treated as individually entitled to the relief provided in section 23(2). The Court applied principles of statutory construction, indicating that the Explanation should govern the interpretation of the earlier sections, especially in cases of ambiguity. Ultimately, the Court answered the question in the affirmative, supporting the assessee's position based on the Explanation added to section 26. The judgment concluded without any order as to costs, with both judges concurring on the decision.
|
