Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2020 (2) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (2) TMI 439 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
Liquidation order under Section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Consideration of Resolution Plan by Association of Employees of Suspended Management under Section 60 of IBC; Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority over the decision of the Committee of Creditors.

Analysis:

Liquidation Order under Section 33 of IBC:
The Resolution Professional (RP) filed an application seeking a liquidation order under Section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) had commenced earlier based on a petition by the Corporate Debtor. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) decided to close the CIRP due to the absence of any resolution plan, prompting the RP to file the liquidation application. The Adjudicating Authority noted the timeline of events and found that the CIRP had closed before the liquidation application was filed.

Consideration of Resolution Plan by Association of Employees under Section 60 of IBC:
An Association claiming to represent all Employees of Suspended Management filed an Interlocutory Application under Section 60 of IBC, requesting consideration of their Resolution Plan and challenging the decision of the CoC to liquidate the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating Authority examined the Association's claims and the documents submitted. It was found that the Association was not a registered body, and the CoC's decision to proceed with liquidation was upheld. Citing legal precedents, the Authority emphasized the commercial aspects of resolution plans being within the CoC's domain, with limited scope for judicial intervention unless decisions are contrary to the law.

Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority over CoC's Decision:
The Adjudicating Authority highlighted the supremacy of the CoC in commercial matters and the limited jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal to review CoC's decisions unless they are perverse or unlawful. Referring to legal judgments, the Authority emphasized that the Tribunal cannot question the CoC's commercial wisdom or decisions unless they violate the provisions of the Code or existing laws. Consequently, the Interlocutory Application was deemed not maintainable, and the liquidation order for the Corporate Debtor was upheld.

In conclusion, the Adjudicating Authority ordered the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor and appointed the Resolution Professional as the Liquidator. The Liquidator was directed to issue a public announcement regarding the liquidation and make efforts to sell the unit as a going concern to maximize creditor value and preserve employment. The Liquidator was instructed to comply with the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, subject to the Authority's directions, thereby disposing of the application accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates