Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (5) TMI 431 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Rejection of contention regarding the assessment order under section 153C of the Income Tax Act.
2. Upholding reliance on seized material despite lack of nexus with the appellant's case.
3. Disallowance of additional payments for land purchase.
4. Disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Act.

Analysis:
1. The first issue pertains to the rejection of the argument that the assessment order should have been made under section 153C instead of section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal considered multiple decisions by coordinate benches, notably the case of Westland Developers Pvt. Ltd, and concluded that section 40A(3) was wrongly invoked as the expenses were not claimed but shown in the capital work in progress account. The tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s decision and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance under section 40A(3).

2. The second issue involves challenging the CIT(A)'s decision to uphold the reliance on seized material from the BPTP Group, despite it having no nexus with the appellant's case. The tribunal found that the material seized did not belong to the assessee and, following precedent, directed the deletion of the disallowance related to additional payments for land purchase, as no deduction was claimed by the assessee.

3. The third issue concerns the disallowance of additional payments made for land purchase. The appellant argued that since no deduction was claimed for these payments, no disallowance should have been made. The tribunal, citing decisions from coordinate benches, including the case of Countrywide Promoters Pvt. Ltd, directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance as there was no basis to sustain the CIT(A)'s order.

4. The fourth issue relates to the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Act. The tribunal found that the provisions of section 40A(3) were wrongly applied as the expenses were not claimed as deductions but were part of the capital work in progress account. Following precedent and considering the facts of the case, the tribunal allowed the appeal and directed the deletion of the disallowance made under section 40A(3).

In conclusion, the tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the deletion of disallowances and additions sustained by the CIT(A) based on the analysis and precedents cited in the judgment.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates