Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + HC Service Tax - 2020 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (7) TMI 89 - HC - Service Tax


Issues:
Challenge to rejection of declaration under Sabka Vishwas Scheme 2019 based on cut-off date for quantification.

Analysis:
The petitioner challenged the rejection of their declaration under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme 2019, specifically for waiver of interest only from April 2015 to June 2017. The rejection was based on the communication dated 05th March 2020, which cited the cut-off date of 30th June 2019 as the reason for rejection. The petitioner argued that they were made aware of the quantification prior to the cut-off date in March 2019. The petitioner contended that the rejection was contrary to the provisions of Section 125(1)(e) of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 2019, which mentions quantification by the cut-off date, not communication.

The petitioner highlighted that an Assistant Commissioner had informed them in a letter dated 05th September 2019 to avail of the Scheme if desired, indicating their eligibility. On the other hand, the respondents argued that the quantification was done post 30th June 2019 and communicated to the petitioner for the first time on 05th September 2019. The respondents rejected the petitioner's reliance on internal correspondences to prove quantification in March 2019.

The Court found that the communication rejecting the petitioner's declaration was issued without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and without considering their case. Consequently, the Court set aside the order/communication dated 05th March 2020 and directed the respondent to provide a hearing to the petitioner on 09th July 2020. The Court allowed the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings if aggrieved by the decision of the respondent, leaving all rights and contentions of the parties open. The Court ordered the upload of the order on the website and forwarded a copy to the learned counsel through email.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates