Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2020 (7) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (7) TMI 108 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of the product intended for manufacture.
2. Applicable rate of Compensation Cess.

Detailed Analysis:

Classification of the Product Intended for Manufacture

Applicant's Argument:
The applicant argued that their product, which involves purchasing raw dried tobacco leaves, removing stems and dust particles, curing with jaggery water, cutting into small pieces, and packing in pouches, should be classified under Chapter sub-heading 24012090 as "Unmanufactured tobacco partly or wholly stemmed or stripped - Others". They emphasized that the product does not undergo any change in its essential character and remains in its original nature, thus fitting the definition of unmanufactured tobacco. They contended that the term "chewing tobacco" is not explicitly defined in the tariff and their product, being raw chewing tobacco without any additives, should be classified under Chapter 2401.

Authority's Analysis:
The Authority examined the manufacturing process and noted that the applicant's product involves curing with jaggery water, cutting, and packing, which are processes that alter the essential character of the tobacco leaves. The Authority referred to the HSN Explanatory Notes and the ICAR-CTRI Central Tobacco Research Institute's information on tobacco curing, which indicated that curing and treatment processes are typically carried out at the farm level before being sold in the market. The Authority concluded that the applicant's product, having undergone additional processing, does not qualify as unmanufactured tobacco under Chapter 2401.

Conclusion:
The product intended to be manufactured by the applicant is classified under CTH 2403 9910 as "Chewing Tobacco". The Authority determined that the product is universally known as chewing tobacco, given its curing, cutting, and packing processes, and is intended for direct consumption.

Applicable Rate of Compensation Cess

Applicant's Argument:
The applicant argued that their product should attract a lower rate of Compensation Cess applicable to unmanufactured tobacco. They cited various case laws and previous Advance Rulings to support their classification under Chapter 2401.

Authority's Analysis:
The Authority referred to Notification No. 01/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, which specifies the rates of Compensation Cess. According to the notification, the rate of Compensation Cess for chewing tobacco supplied without a lime tube is 160%.

Conclusion:
The applicable rate of Compensation Cess for the product intended to be manufactured by the applicant, classified under CTH 2403 9910 as "Chewing Tobacco", is 160% as per Sl. No. 26 of Notification No. 01/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

Ruling:
1. The product intended to be manufactured by the applicant and supplied as 'Chewing tobacco' with the brand name 'Kavi cut tobacco' is classifiable under CTH 2403 9910- Chewing Tobacco.
2. The applicable rate of Compensation Cess is 160% as per Notification No. 01/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates