9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Justification of the Tribunal in condoning the delay in filing the income-tax return. 2. Deletion of the penalty levied under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Justification of the Tribunal in Condoning the Delay in Filing the Income-tax Return The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the income-tax returns for the assessment years 1959-60 and 1960-61. In both cases, the returns were filed significantly late-by 34 months and 47 months, respectively. The Tribunal's decision was influenced by its previous order in Income-tax Appeal No. 19571 of 1967-68 for the assessment year 1958-59, where it was held that the assessee had a reasonable cause for the delay up to February 15, 1962. The Tribunal observed that the facts in the present cases were similar to those in the earlier case. It was noted that the assessee had requested extensions for filing the return, and there was no response from the Income-tax Officer, leading the assessee to reasonably believe that his request had been conceded. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that there was a reasonable cause for the delay and condoned it. 2. Deletion of the Penalty Levied under Section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 The Tribunal deleted the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. For the assessment year 1959-60, a penalty of Rs. 43,722 was initially imposed, which was later reduced to Rs. 42,625 by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Tribunal, however, deleted the entire penalty, reasoning that the penalty should be related to the tax payable as per the demand notice, which was Rs. 19,717, including penal interest. Since the final assessment resulted in a refund of Rs. 4,600 to the assessee, the Tribunal held that no penalty could be imposed when no tax was payable. Similarly, for the assessment year 1960-61, the Tribunal found a reasonable cause for the delay and deleted the penalty imposed by the Income-tax Officer, which was upheld by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. Legal Reasoning: The Tribunal's decision was based on the interpretation of section 271(1)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which allows for a penalty if a person has failed to furnish the return of total income without reasonable cause. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had a reasonable cause for the delay, as the requests for extensions were not responded to by the Income-tax Officer, leading to a reasonable belief that the extensions were granted. High Court's Decision: The High Court dismissed the petitions filed by the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the question of whether there was a reasonable cause for the delay in filing the returns is a pure question of fact and not a question of law. The court cited precedents, including Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax and Manindra Land and Building Corporation Ltd. v. Bhutnath Banerjee, to support its decision that inferences from facts are questions of fact and not open to review by the court. The High Court concluded that no question of law arose from the Tribunal's orders, and therefore, no direction was issued to the Tribunal to refer the question for the court's opinion. Conclusion: The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decisions to condone the delay in filing the income-tax returns and to delete the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as these were based on findings of fact and did not involve any questions of law. The petitions were dismissed with no order as to costs.
|
