9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Assessment under Estate Duty Act post the Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Customary law of Sikh Jats vs. Mitakshara school of Hindu law; Valuation of joint family property for estate duty purposes.
Analysis: The case involved a question of law referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the assessment under the Estate Duty Act, specifically whether the assessment should be made under section 7 read with section 39 of the Act in light of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The deceased, a member of a Jat family, had his entire property charged to estate duty upon his death. The contention raised was that due to the Hindu Succession Act, the property should be considered as belonging to a Hindu undivided family under the Mitakshara school. The Tribunal accepted this argument, deeming it a case of a Hindu undivided family, and allowed the appeal based on this premise. The relevant sections of the Estate Duty Act, i.e., sections 7 and 39, were examined to determine their applicability in the case. These sections deal with the valuation of coparcenary interest in joint family property governed by the Mitakshara school of Hindu law upon the death of a coparcener. The central issue was whether the deceased and his sons constituted a joint Hindu family under the Mitakshara school of Hindu law and if his interest in the property was that of a coparcener, thus affecting the estate duty valuation. The High Court, after hearing arguments from both parties, held that the mere enforcement of the Hindu Succession Act did not automatically abolish custom and convert all Jats into members of joint Hindu families under the Mitakshara school. The court emphasized that factors such as the abrogation of custom, adherence to Mitakshara law, formation of a joint Hindu family, and coparcenary interest needed to be individually established in each case. In the present case, the court found that the facts did not support the conclusion that the deceased and his sons formed a joint Hindu family under the Mitakshara school. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the department, negating the applicability of sections 7 and 39 for estate duty assessment. The judgment directed the case to be remanded to the Tribunal for a comprehensive review on the merits, emphasizing that all arguments raised by the assessee must be considered. The court highlighted that the appeal should not have been decided solely on the legal point discussed. No costs were awarded in this matter. The second judge on the panel concurred with the decision of the primary judge.
|
