9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (11) TMI 270 - AT - Income TaxNature of expenses - product development expenses - revenue or capital expenditure - HELD THAT - As decided in own case for immediate preceding assessment year 2011-12 even prior to the current year as well as during the year the assessee has purchased and sold the product which were tested as per the analytical report. We also observe that assessee has been in the business of manufacturing of pesticides since last seven years and the practice of getting the product tested with analytical report was being followed by the assessee since earlier years. Therefore we find that observation of the assessing officer was not factually correct. TDS u/s 195 - Disallowance of foreign commission u/s. 40(a)(i) - assessee has paid export Sales Commission to various non-resident parties on which TDS was not deducted - HELD THAT - In the case of GE Technology 2010 (9) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT wherein it is held that pair is bound to deduct tax at sourced only if the tax is assessable in India if tax is not so assessable, there is no question of tax at source being deducted. Assessee also cited a judgment of MGM Exports 2018 (5) TMI 1240 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT wherein held that fundamental principle of deducting tax at source in connection with payment only, where the sum is chargeable to tax under the Act, still continues to hold the field. In the present case, the Revenue has not seven seriously contended that the payment to foreign commission agent was not taxable in India. - Decided against revenue. Disallowance of interest u/s. 40A(2)(b) - justification for interest paid on unsecured loan at the rate of 18%. - A.O. after reducing 3% of interest allowed 15% interest - CIT(A) who granted relief on the ground that A.O. has not given any basis and support to adopt the interest rate at 15% per annum as the prevalent interest rate - HELD THAT - In the matter of Laxmi Pulse Rice 2012 (8) TMI 1183 - ITAT AHMEDABAD wherein similar issue was decided by the Co-ordinate Bench in favour of the assessee and allowed 18% of interest and similar rate of interest was allowed by the Co-ordinate Bench. Disallowance of capitalization of interest u/s. 36(1)(iii) - CIT(A) who granted relief to the assessee on the ground that interest bearing funds utilized for the capital advances is without any basis and therefore disallowance of interest was deleted - HELD THAT - We can read from the order of the ld. CIT(A) wherein audited balance sheet with regard to share capital and reserve and surplus were reproduced wherein assessee is having share capital of ₹ 2500 lacs and reserve and surplus is having of ₹ 2514 lacs and total comes to 5014 lacs. Meaning thereby, assessee is having interest free funds for much more. - Decided against revenue.
Issues:
1. Disallowance of product development expenses 2. Disallowance of foreign commission under section 40(a)(i) 3. Disallowance of interest under section 40A(2)(b) 4. Disallowance of capitalization of interest under section 36(i)(iii) 1. Disallowance of Product Development Expenses: The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting a disallowance of ?1,07,07,684 on product development expenses, treating it as capital expenditure. The assessee, engaged in manufacturing and trading of pesticides, claimed the expenses were consistent with past practices. The ITAT dismissed the appeal, citing a previous decision in favor of the assessee for a similar claim, emphasizing the factual correctness of the expenses. 2. Disallowance of Foreign Commission: The Revenue contested the deletion of a disallowance of foreign commission under section 40(a)(i) amounting to ?59,15,144. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing the obligation to deduct tax at source only if the payment is taxable in India. Citing a judgment from the Jurisdictional High Court, the ITAT dismissed the appeal, following the principle that tax deduction applies only when the payment is taxable in India. 3. Disallowance of Interest: Regarding the disallowance of interest under section 40A(2)(b) of ?15,88,604, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, emphasizing the lack of a basis for adopting a 15% interest rate. Referring to a previous case, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing 18% interest, similar to the Co-ordinate Bench's decision, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. 4. Disallowance of Capitalization of Interest: The Revenue challenged the deletion of a disallowance of ?6,27,300 for capitalization of interest under section 36(i)(iii). The ITAT noted the absence of evidence establishing a nexus between surplus funds and capital advances. Citing a judgment from the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, considering the availability of interest-free funds and dismissing the appeal. In conclusion, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal on all grounds, emphasizing consistency with past decisions and legal principles governing tax deductions and disallowances.
|
