Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2020 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (11) TMI 660 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
Challenging pre-assessment notices for multiple Assessment Years based on violation of court principles.

Analysis:
The Writ Petitions were filed challenging pre-assessment notices for various Assessment Years, contending that they violated principles set by the court in a previous case. The court noted that the Officer had called for the petitioner to provide details to substantiate alleged mismatches between returns. The court referred to a previous case which emphasized addressing mismatches scientifically and establishing a central mechanism for data sharing among assessing officers to avoid factual discrepancies. However, the court observed that this central mechanism was yet to be established.

The court highlighted that pending the establishment of the central mechanism, Assessing Authorities could still obtain case-specific details and share them with the assessee for their response. Transparency in sharing materials relied upon by the Department for assessments prior to completion was deemed crucial. The court emphasized that the decision in the previous case bound the Department strictly. The Commissioner had issued a circular directing assessing officers to keep assessments involving mismatches pending until the central mechanism was in place. Nevertheless, officers were instructed to make efforts to collect details from third-party dealers, address any mismatches, and finalize assessments in compliance with the previous court decision and the law.

In the present case, it was confirmed that details of third-party dealers had been collected and were available to the Officer. Consequently, the court allowed proceedings to continue without waiting for the central sharing mechanism to be established, as the purpose had been fulfilled in this instance. The Writ Petitions were dismissed as premature, with the petitioner instructed to appear before the Assessing Officer on a specified date. Further proceedings were to be conducted in line with the principles outlined in the previous case and the current order. No costs were imposed, and connected Miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates