2020 (12) TMI 625 - HC - GST

Detention of goods - reason for detention was that the transportation of the goods was not supported by a valid e-way bill - HELD THAT - The detention in question cannot be said to be unjustified. It is directed that if the petitioner furnishes a bank guarantee for the amount demanded in Ext.P3, the respondent shall permit the petitioner to clear the goods and the vehicle, and thereafter pass the final order under Section 129 of the Act

Summary

The petitioner challenged the detention of goods due to mismatch in e-way bill route. The court found the detention justified but allowed clearance upon bank guarantee submission. The petitioner must provide the judgment copy to the respondent for further action.