9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (1) TMI 435 - AAR - GSTClassification of services - consultancy services - pure services or not - Scope of the terms used in the contract / agreement - service receiver i.e. Surat Municipal Corporation Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority Pune Municipal Corporation Executive Engineer Public Works Division Pune and Rajkot Smart City Development ltd. - Central Government or State Government or Union Territory or Local Authority or a Governmental Authority or a Government Entity ? - relation to any function entrusted to a Municipality under Article 243W of the Constitution of India read with twelfth schedule or not. Whether the technical/consultancy services provided by the applicant to various entities such as Surat Municipal Corporation Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority Pune Municipal Corporation Rajkot Smart City Development ltd. Executive Engineer Public Works(East) Division Pune State of Maharashtra and Gujarat Technical University as per the various agreements is exempted under Entry No.3 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 or otherwise? HELD THAT - looking to the terminology and words used in the said clauses of the contract / agreement it is very difficult to conclude that it pertains purely to services only. In fact on going through the same we get the impression that this does not appear to be a supply of pure service only but also includes supply of goods along with supply of services. Further as reported by the concerned officer and as per the GST portal the applicant supplies Works Contract Service also besides supplying design and consultancy services and few other services and looking to the aforementioned facts it appears that Works Contract Service may also be involved in the said contract. If a person provides only service to any person without involvement of supply of goods along with supply of services then the same would be termed as supply of pure service - the Financial offer as per the contract/agreement includes the GST amount and that GST is to be paid to the Government as per the terms and conditions of the Contract/Agreement. This itself proves that the applicant is not eligible for the benefit of the provisions of Entry No.3 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 under which the rate of GST is NIL. In view of the above facts it is concluded that the aforementioned services supplied by the applicant to Surat Municipal Corporation are not Pure services. Since the applicant has failed to satisfy the very first condition in order to be eligible for the exemption there is no need to discuss other conditions at all. Regarding services provided by them to Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority - HELD that - An agreement has materialised between the applicant and AUDA in respect to the above work which has not been submitted by the applicant even though this fact was brought to the notice of his representative during the course of personal hearing. In absence of the agreement/contract and without going through the terms and conditions of the contract it would not be possible for us to analyse as to whether the services provided by the applicant are pure or otherwise since this involves the construction of a Town Hall and only after going through the agreement can it be confirmed whether the services supplied by the applicant are pure services or are services supplied along with supply of goods. It also appears that the applicant has deliberately not provided the copy of agreement for reasons best known to him - the services provided by the applicant to Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority are not Pure services. Since the applicant has failed to satisfy the very first condition in order to be eligible for the exemption there is no need to discuss other conditions at all. Further analyzing of various other services being supplied under different contracts / agreement it is found that none is eligible for exemption from GSt. The exemption under Entry No.3 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is not available to the applicant in any of the aforementioned agreements/contracts entered into by them.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the services provided by the applicant are "pure services." 2. Whether the service recipients qualify as 'Central Government,' 'State Government,' 'Union Territory,' 'Local Authority,' 'Governmental Authority,' or 'Government Entity.' 3. Whether the services provided are in relation to any function entrusted to a Municipality under Article 243W of the Constitution. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Whether the services provided by the applicant are "pure services." The applicant provides a range of professional consulting services, including architecture, engineering, and project management. The applicant contends that these services fall under SAC Code 99832 and are liable to tax at 18%. The applicant argues that the services provided to various government entities should be exempt under Entry No.3 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017, which exempts pure services provided to government entities. However, the Authority found that the services provided by the applicant often include elements that go beyond pure services, such as the provision of goods or works contract services. For instance, the services provided to Surat Municipal Corporation included comprehensive consultancy services that involved electrical systems, HVAC, and other engineering services, which indicated the inclusion of goods. Similarly, services to Pune Municipal Corporation and Gujarat Technological University involved detailed architectural and structural designs, which were not purely services. Issue 2: Whether the service recipients qualify as 'Central Government,' 'State Government,' 'Union Territory,' 'Local Authority,' 'Governmental Authority,' or 'Government Entity.' The Authority examined whether the entities receiving the services fit the definitions provided in the relevant notifications. The entities in question included Surat Municipal Corporation, Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, Pune Municipal Corporation, Rajkot Smart City Development Ltd., Executive Engineer, Public Works (East) Division, Pune, and Gujarat Technological University. While these entities generally qualify as government bodies or entities, the critical issue was whether the services provided to them were pure services. The Authority concluded that since the services provided included elements beyond pure services, the qualification of the service recipients as government entities did not affect the taxability of the services. Issue 3: Whether the services provided are in relation to any function entrusted to a Municipality under Article 243W of the Constitution. The Authority examined whether the services provided by the applicant were in relation to functions listed under Article 243W of the Constitution, which includes urban planning, regulation of land use, and construction of buildings, among others. For instance, the services provided to Surat Municipal Corporation for the design and consultancy of a high-rise office building were not considered to be in relation to any function entrusted to a Municipality under Article 243W. Similarly, the services provided to Pune Municipal Corporation and Gujarat Technological University were also not considered to be in relation to any such functions. Conclusion: The Authority concluded that the services provided by the applicant to the various government entities did not qualify for exemption under Entry No.3 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The reasons included the inclusion of goods and works contract services in the consultancy services provided, and the fact that the services were not purely in relation to functions entrusted to a Municipality under Article 243W of the Constitution. Ruling: 1. Services provided to Surat Municipal Corporation are not covered under Entry No.3 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017. 2. Services provided to Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority are not covered under Entry No.3 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017. 3. Services provided to Pune Municipal Corporation are not covered under Entry No.3 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017. 4. Services provided to Rajkot Smart City Development Ltd. are not covered under Entry No.3 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017. 5. Services provided to Executive Engineer, Public Works (East) Division, Pune are not covered under Entry No.3 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017. 6. Services provided to Gujarat Technological University are not covered under Entry No.3 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
|
