Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2021 (1) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (1) TMI 584 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the activities carried out by the applicant to the plot holders amount to supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017.
2. Whether the applicant qualifies as a "Governmental Authority" and is eligible for exemptions under Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether the activities carried out by the applicant to the plot holders amount to supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017:

The applicant, Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC), was established under the Gujarat Industrial Development Act, 1962, to secure the orderly establishment and organization of industries in industrial areas and estates in Gujarat. The applicant provides plots of land on lease, infrastructure facilities, and maintenance services to plot holders. The applicant sought a ruling on whether these activities amount to a supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017.

Section 7(1) of the CGST Act defines "supply" to include all forms of supply of goods or services made for consideration in the course or furtherance of business. The term "business" under Section 2(17) includes trade, commerce, manufacture, profession, vocation, adventure, or any other similar activity, whether or not it is for pecuniary benefit. It also includes any activity or transaction undertaken by the Central Government, a State Government, or any local authority in which they are engaged as public authorities.

The applicant argued that their activities do not amount to business as they are statutory duties performed under the GIDC Act. However, the ruling emphasized that the activities provided by the applicant fall under the definition of "business" as per Section 2(17) of the CGST Act. Therefore, the activities of leasing plots, providing infrastructure, and maintenance services to plot holders are considered as supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017, and are liable to GST.

2. Whether the applicant qualifies as a "Governmental Authority" and is eligible for exemptions under Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017:

The applicant claimed exemption under Entry No.4 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), which exempts services provided by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory, local authority, or governmental authority by way of any activity in relation to any function entrusted to a municipality under Article 243W of the Constitution.

The ruling examined whether the applicant qualifies as a "Governmental Authority." The GIDC was established by the Gujarat Industrial Development Act, 1962, and its top management, including the Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Managing Director, and Directors, are appointed by the State Government. The ruling referred to judicial precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in the applicant's own case, which indicated that the GIDC functions as a wing of the State Government.

The ruling concluded that the GIDC is a part of the State Government and functions as an agency of the Government in carrying out the purpose and object of industrial development. Therefore, the GIDC falls under the category of "State Government" and not as a separate "Governmental Authority."

Further, the ruling examined whether the services provided by the applicant are in relation to any function entrusted to a municipality under Article 243W of the Constitution. The Twelfth Schedule of the Constitution lists functions such as urban planning, regulation of land-use, water supply, public health, and sanitation. The ruling found that the establishment and development of industries do not fall under these functions.

The ruling also referred to Entry No.6 of Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), which exempts services provided by the Central Government, State Government, Union territory, or local authority, except services provided to business entities. Since the applicant provides services to business entities (industries), the exemption under Entry No.6 is not applicable.

Conclusion:

The ruling concluded that the various activities carried out by the applicant to the plot holders amount to supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017, and are liable to GST. The applicant does not qualify for exemptions under Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as they fall under the category of "State Government" and their services are provided to business entities.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates