Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + Tri Companies Law - 2021 (1) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (1) TMI 986 - Tri - Companies Law


Issues Involved:
1. Dispensation of meetings of equity shareholders and unsecured creditors.
2. Compliance with statutory requirements for the Scheme of Amalgamation.
3. Accounting treatment and regulatory compliance.
4. Consent of equity shareholders, unsecured creditors, and secured creditors.
5. Notifications to statutory authorities.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Dispensation of Meetings of Equity Shareholders and Unsecured Creditors:
The application sought the dispensation of meetings of the equity shareholders and unsecured creditors of the applicant companies. The Tribunal noted that all equity shareholders of the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Applicant Companies had provided written consent for the Scheme of Amalgamation, waiving their right to convene and hold meetings. The consent affidavits were duly submitted, leading to the dispensation of these meetings. Additionally, the unsecured creditors of the Second and Fourth Applicant Companies also provided consent, leading to the dispensation of their meetings as well.

2. Compliance with Statutory Requirements for the Scheme of Amalgamation:
The application was filed under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal noted that the registered offices of the applicant companies were situated in Gujarat, falling under its jurisdiction. The Scheme of Amalgamation aimed to transfer the entire business, assets, and liabilities of the transferor companies to the transferee company, effective from the appointed date mentioned in the Scheme. The Tribunal confirmed that the Scheme was in compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

3. Accounting Treatment and Regulatory Compliance:
The applicant companies stated that the accounting treatment specified in the Scheme of Amalgamation conformed to the Accounting Standards prescribed by the Central Government under Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. Certificates from the auditors confirming this compliance were submitted. Furthermore, it was stated that no investigation or proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956/2013 were pending against the applicant companies, and no winding-up petitions were pending.

4. Consent of Equity Shareholders, Unsecured Creditors, and Secured Creditors:
The Tribunal reviewed the consent affidavits from the equity shareholders and unsecured creditors. The First, Second, Third, and Fourth Applicant Companies had obtained written consent from all their equity shareholders. The Second Applicant Company had one unsecured creditor who consented to the Scheme, while the Fourth Applicant Company had 106 unsecured creditors, with 91.14% in value approving the Scheme. The Fourth Applicant Company also had one secured creditor who provided consent. These consents led to the dispensation of meetings for considering the Scheme.

5. Notifications to Statutory Authorities:
The applicant companies were directed to send notices of the meetings, along with the Scheme of Amalgamation, explanatory statement, and disclosures, to the Central Government, Registrar of Companies, concerned Income Tax Authorities, and the Official Liquidator. These authorities were given 30 days to make any representations, failing which it would be presumed they had no objections.

Conclusion:
Considering the consent affidavits from equity shareholders, unsecured creditors, and the secured creditor, and the compliance with statutory requirements, the Tribunal allowed the application and dispensed with the meetings of equity shareholders and unsecured creditors. The Company Application was allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates