Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Board Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2021 (3) TMI Board This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (3) TMI 248 - Board - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
- Alleged contraventions of sections 208(2)(a) and 208(2)(e) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and regulations 7(2)(a), 7(2)(h), and 7A of the IBBI (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016.
- Interpretation of Regulation 7A of the IP regulations regarding the requirement for Insolvency Professionals to hold a valid Authorization for Assignment (AFA).
- Compliance with the Code of Conduct specified in the First Schedule of the IP Regulations by the Insolvency Professional.
- Examination of the actions and submissions of Mr. Satinder Kapur in response to the Show-Cause Notice issued by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI).
- Consideration of the disciplinary action taken by the ICSI Institute of Insolvency Professionals against Mr. Satinder Kapur.

Analysis:

1. The Show-Cause Notice (SCN) was issued to Mr. Satinder Kapur by the IBBI for accepting an assignment as a liquidator without a valid Authorization for Assignment (AFA) after 31st December 2019. Mr. Kapur defended his actions by stating that he accepted the assignment before the cut-off date and was under the belief that AFA was not required at the time.

2. The allegations against Mr. Kapur included contraventions of specific sections of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and regulations related to accepting assignments without the necessary authorization. Mr. Kapur's submissions highlighted his unintentional error due to a misunderstanding of the regulations.

3. The Disciplinary Committee (DC) considered the provisions of the Code, rules, and regulations in their analysis. Regulation 7A clearly mandates that an Insolvency Professional must hold a valid AFA before undertaking any assignment after 31st December 2019. The DC emphasized the importance of compliance with the regulations and the Code of Conduct.

4. The DC noted that the credibility of insolvency processes relies on the conduct and competence of the Insolvency Professional. Mr. Kapur's acceptance of the assignment before the regulatory deadline was a key factor in the decision. The DC also highlighted the obligations of IPs to follow the Code, regulations, and bye-laws of their professional agency.

5. Despite discrepancies in dates mentioned in the disciplinary actions taken by the IPA, the DC found that Mr. Kapur had already faced disciplinary measures from the ICSI Institute of Insolvency Professionals. Considering this, the DC disposed of the Show-Cause Notice without imposing any further directions against Mr. Kapur.

6. The final order forwarded a copy to the ICSI Institute of Insolvency Professionals and the Registrar of the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, for information. The Show-Cause Notice was officially disposed of based on the disciplinary action already taken against Mr. Satinder Kapur.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates