Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2021 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (3) TMI 598 - HC - Indian Laws


Issues:
Criminal revision against conviction and sentence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Compromise settlement between the parties.

Analysis:
The criminal revision application challenged the order confirming the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The petitioner was directed to undergo imprisonment for six months and pay a compensation amount of ?1.50 lakhs to the complainant. The petitioner had deposited the compensation amount in the court's account, showing an intention to settle the matter out of court. The opposite party no.2 expressed willingness to accept the amount and set aside the conviction and sentence as part of a compromise settlement, emphasizing the friendly nature of the loan transaction.

The court considered the facts and circumstances, noting that the case arose from a friendly loan between the parties. After hearing both sides, the court found that the petitioner had issued a cheque that was dishonored, leading to legal proceedings. The petitioner's act of depositing the compensation amount and the opposite party's willingness to accept it for settlement were crucial in the court's decision. The court acknowledged the readiness of both parties to resolve the matter amicably, emphasizing the importance of restoring cordial relations between them.

In light of the settlement between the parties, the court set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner. The deposited amount of ?1.50 lakhs was directed to be remitted to the opposite party's account as per the details provided. The court disposed of the revision application, discharged the petitioner's bailors, closed pending applications, and ordered the lower court records to be sent back. The order was to be communicated to the lower court via FAX, concluding the legal proceedings in the matter.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates