Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2021 (3) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (3) TMI 920 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
1. Initiation of liquidation proceedings under Section 33 and 34 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.
2. Compliance with procedural requirements and timelines.
3. Appointment and role of the Liquidator.
4. Liquidation costs, sale as a going concern, and fees of the Liquidator.
5. Pending applications and their impact on liquidation proceedings.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Initiation of Liquidation Proceedings:
The application IA No. 131/JPR/2020 was filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) for initiating liquidation proceedings against the Corporate Debtor under Sections 33 and 34 of the IBC, 2016. The application was filed due to the absence of any resolution plan received during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Tribunal observed that the directors of the Corporate Debtor had no role in the CIRP, making their inclusion irrelevant.

2. Compliance with Procedural Requirements and Timelines:
The application under Section 7 of the Code was admitted on 20.09.2019, and the CIRP was to be completed by 18.03.2020. Despite multiple invitations for Expressions of Interest (EOI), no resolution plan was received. The CoC resolved to liquidate the Corporate Debtor in its 5th meeting on 17.03.2020. The application for liquidation was filed within the prescribed period, considering the exclusion of the lockdown period due to COVID-19 as per the Supreme Court's order dated 23.03.2020 and IBBI Notification dated 20.04.2020.

3. Appointment and Role of the Liquidator:
Section 34(1) of the IBC mandates that the RP shall act as the Liquidator upon submission of written consent. The CoC resolved to appoint Mr. Satyendra Prasad Khorania as the Liquidator, and he provided his written consent. His credentials were verified, and no adverse findings were noted. Thus, Mr. Khorania was appointed as the Liquidator.

4. Liquidation Costs, Sale as a Going Concern, and Fees of the Liquidator:
- Liquidation Costs: The CoC did not decide on the estimated liquidation cost but resolved that it would be approved by the Stakeholders Committee during liquidation.
- Sale as a Going Concern: The CoC resolved to sell the Corporate Debtor as a going concern as the first option, or its business as a going concern as the second option, before exploring other options.
- Fees of the Liquidator: The CoC resolved on the Liquidator's fees, stipulating that it would be the same as the RP's fee for certain periods and fixed at ?50,000 per month if the secured financial creditor did not relinquish its security interest.

5. Pending Applications and Their Impact:
- IA No. 424/JPR/2019: Filed under Section 19(2) of the Code to direct the suspended directors and statutory auditor to cooperate with the RP. It was directed to be listed with the main case.
- IA No. 93/JPR/2020: Filed by the erstwhile director challenging the CIRP order, which became infructuous after the NCLAT dismissed the appeal.
- IA Nos. 112/JPR/2020, 120/JPR/2020, and 141/JPR/2020: Filed to report minutes of CoC meetings, which were considered in the proceedings and disposed of.

Conclusion:
The Corporate Debtor is directed to be liquidated as per Chapter III of the IBC, 2016. The Liquidator is to take necessary actions, including publishing a public announcement, filing preliminary and progress reports, and managing the affairs of the Corporate Debtor. Pending applications were addressed, and relevant directions were issued for their disposal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates