9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (4) TMI 466 - HC - Income TaxRevision u/s 263 - Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - HELD THAT - Non-resident assessee did not carry on any business operations in the taxable territories. They acted as selling agents outside India. The receipt in India of the sale proceeds of tobacco remitted or caused to be remitted by the purchasers from abroad does not amount to an operation carried out by the assessee in India as contemplated by clause (a) of the Explanation to section 9(1)(i) of the Act. The commission amounts which were earned by the non-resident assessee for services rendered outside India cannot, therefore, be deemed to be incomes which have either accrued or arisen in India. The High Court was, therefore, right in answering the question against the Department. As relying on M/S. FLUIDTHERM TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD., 2015 (4) TMI 191 - MADRAS HIGH COURT and MALABAR INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 2000 (2) TMI 10 - SUPREME COURT issue decided in favour of assessee.
Issues:
Challenge to order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for assessment year 2008-2009, substantial questions of law raised, interpretation of Income Tax Act, applicability of Circular No.7 of 2009, determination of fees for technical services, consideration of Supreme Court judgments. Analysis: 1. The High Court considered the appeal challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment year 2008-2009. The substantial questions of law raised included the Tribunal's justification in canceling the Commissioner's order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act without proper consideration, the jurisdiction of the Commissioner under section 263, and the applicability of CBDT Circular No.7 of 2009 to assessments completed after its issuance. The appellant, Revenue, argued against the Tribunal's decisions based on the interpretation of relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act. The High Court referred to a previous decision by a Division Bench that had considered similar issues and provided relevant legal analysis to support its decision. 2. The High Court analyzed the provisions of section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act to determine the nature of fees for technical services paid to a non-resident agent. The Court emphasized that the commission paid to the agent for procuring export orders did not fall under the definition of fees for technical services. The Court referred to previous Supreme Court judgments to support its interpretation and concluded that the services provided by the non-resident agent were not technical services but rather related to completing export commitments. The Court also discussed the implications of the Explanation to section 9(2) of the Act and its retrospective effect from June 1, 1976. 3. The High Court further considered the Supreme Court's judgment in Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Kerala State, which emphasized that an order by the Assessing Officer must be erroneous to be prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. The Court applied this principle to the present case and found that the decisions of the Tribunal and the Commissioner were in line with legal interpretations and previous judgments. Based on the legal analysis and precedents cited, the High Court dismissed the Tax Case Appeal, ruling in favor of the respondent-assessee and confirming the decisions of the lower authorities. 4. In conclusion, the High Court's judgment provided a detailed analysis of the issues raised in the appeal, including the interpretation of relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, the applicability of circulars, and the determination of fees for technical services. The Court's decision was based on legal principles, precedents, and a thorough examination of the facts and arguments presented by both parties.
|
