Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + CGOVT Customs - 1981 (5) TMI CGOVT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1981 (5) TMI 28 - CGOVT - Customs

Issues:
1. Classification of imported polyethylene glycol under the Customs Act, 1962.
2. Interpretation of the relevant tariff entries for classification.
3. Consideration of exclusion clauses and relevant chapter notes.
4. Assessment of countervailing duty and refund claims.
5. Application of statutory provisions for classification of goods.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to a revision application by a company regarding the classification of imported polyethylene glycol under the Customs Act, 1962. The company imported the product, which was initially assessed under item 39.01/06 at a specific duty rate. Subsequently, the company sought a refund, arguing that the product should be classified under a different heading with a lower duty rate. The company's appeal was rejected by the Appellate Collector, leading to the revision application before the Government of India.

The company raised several arguments in their revision application. Firstly, they contended that polyethylene glycol should not be classified under item 39.01 as it does not have the characteristics of artificial plastic material. They also argued that the molecular weight range of the product should be considered for classification. Additionally, they referred to a tariff ruling by the Central Board of Excise & Customs to support their classification claim.

Upon careful consideration of the arguments and examination of the records, the Government of India rejected the company's plea for a refund of countervailing duty, as no such duty was charged in the case. The Government proceeded to analyze the company's original plea for re-assessment under a different tariff entry. The Government observed that the literature provided by the company contradicted their claim of the product being low molecular weight polymers. Furthermore, the exclusion clause relied upon by the company was found in a different tariff and not applicable to the present case.

Regarding the classification of polyethylene glycol, the Government clarified that the product falls under chapter 39.01/06, encompassing various polymer products beyond artificial plastics and resins. The Government emphasized that the classification criteria do not mandate the product to be artificial plastic material. The argument that only plastic materials are covered under chapter 39 was deemed baseless.

Lastly, the Government addressed the company's argument regarding a ruling on the classification of polyethylene glycol under a different statute. Since the product was specifically covered under chapter 39.01/06 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, the assessment under the said entry was upheld, resulting in the rejection of the revision application.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates