Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2021 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (8) TMI 1086 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Rejection of assessee's claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
The appeal pertained to the rejection of the assessee's claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessee, a Co-operative Housing Society, earned interest income from deposits with a Co-operative Bank. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction claim based on the insertion of section 80P(4) by the Finance Act, 2006. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the assessment order, leading to the present appeal. The primary contention was whether interest income from deposits with cooperative banks is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act.

The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of section 80P(2)(d) and relevant case laws to determine the eligibility of the assessee for the deduction claimed. It noted that the issue of whether interest income from cooperative bank deposits qualifies for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) had not been conclusively settled. Referring to the decision in the case of Kaliandas Udyog Bhavan Premises Co-op Society Ltd., the Tribunal held that interest income derived by a co-operative society from investments with a cooperative bank is entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act.

Additionally, the Tribunal cited the decision of the Pune Bench in the case of Majalgaon Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., which supported the deduction claim under section 80P(2)(d) for interest and dividend income from cooperative bank investments. The Tribunal emphasized that the cooperative bank should be considered a cooperative society for the purpose of section 80P(2)(d). The judgments of the Karnataka High Court and Gujarat High Court were also referenced, highlighting differing views on the issue.

Considering conflicting decisions, the Tribunal applied the principle that favors the assessee, as per the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of K. Subramanian vs. Siemens India Ltd. The Tribunal concluded that the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P(2)(d) for interest derived from investments with the cooperative bank was permissible. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on August 20, 2021.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates