9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (11) TMI 258 - AT - Income TaxRevision u/s 263 by CIT - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 initiated by AO - escapement of capital gain arising from sale of an industrial plot - HELD THAT - AO did not make any addition on the issue for which the assessment was reopened - meaning thereby the reassessment proceedings become final. The learned Commissioner cannot explore any other issue under Section 263 which even cannot be explored by the Assessing Officer in reassessment proceedings; because, on the original point on which assessment was reopened, no addition was made. The jurisdiction of the learned Commissioner is confined to the issues on which an assessment is reopened and examined by the AO. The other issues can only be entertained if addition is being made on the issue for which the assessment was reopened. We can make it very clear that if the Assessing Officer has made any addition on account of Long Term Capital Gain earned by the assessee for transfer of industrial plot, then other points could also be examined. Similarly, learned Commissioner could also be found out a fault of the Assessing Officer qua the issue of transfer of industrial plot. If that aspect was considered by the learned Commissioner as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue; thereafter other aspects on the issue of share transactions would also be examined; but in the absence of any addition on the first point, no other issue can be entertained, even under revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act. We, therefore, allow this appeal and quash the impugned order passed under Section 263 of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) can take up a new issue under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, during reassessment proceedings when no addition was made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the point for which the assessment was reopened. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Jurisdiction of PCIT under Section 263 during Reassessment Proceedings Background: The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the PCIT, Ahmedabad-3, dated 29.03.2021, for Assessment Year 2011-12. The primary grievance was that the PCIT erred in taking cognizance under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and setting aside the assessment order dated 24.12.2018, directing the AO to pass a fresh assessment order. Reopening of Assessment: The assessee originally filed a return of income on 07.07.2012, declaring Nil income. The AO reopened the assessment under Section 148 of the Act due to information received about the transfer of a capital asset (an industrial plot) by the assessee to a firm as a capital contribution, which was not taxed as per Section 45(3) of the Act. The AO issued a notice under Section 148 and subsequently passed an assessment order on 24.12.2018 under Section 144 r.w.s. 147, accepting the returned income at Nil. PCIT's Revision under Section 263: The PCIT reviewed the assessment order and found it erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The PCIT noted that the AO failed to verify the Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) claimed by the assessee on the sale of shares and the corresponding deductions under various sections (54/54B/54D/54EC/54F/54G/54GA) of the Act. The PCIT issued a show-cause notice to the assessee, which went unresponded. Legal Interpretation: Section 147 of the Act allows the AO to reassess any escaped income and any other income that comes to notice during the reassessment proceedings. However, judicial precedents from the Hon'ble High Courts (CIT Vs. Mohmed Juned Dadani, Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. CIT, and CIT Vs. Jet Airways (I) Ltd.) have interpreted that "any other income" can only be reassessed if an addition is made on the original point for which the assessment was reopened. Tribunal's Findings: The Tribunal observed that the AO did not make any addition on the issue for which the assessment was reopened (capital gain from the transfer of the industrial plot). Hence, the reassessment proceedings became final. The PCIT could not explore any other issue under Section 263 if no addition was made on the original point of reassessment. The jurisdiction of the PCIT is confined to the issues on which the assessment was reopened and examined by the AO. Other issues can only be entertained if an addition is made on the original point. Conclusion: Since the AO did not make any addition on the original issue (capital gain from the transfer of the industrial plot), the PCIT could not take up a new issue (LTCG from the sale of shares) under Section 263. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the impugned order passed under Section 263 of the Act. Result: The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order of the PCIT under Section 263 was quashed. Order Pronouncement: The order was pronounced in the Court on 12th October 2021 at Ahmedabad.
|
