Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2021 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (11) TMI 509 - HC - GST


Issues:
1. Rectification and issuance of statutory forms for the fourth quarter of the year 2016-17 under CST rules.
2. Revision of returns under DVAT Act and Rules.

Analysis:

The petitioner sought directions to rectify and issue forms as per the requisition of statutory forms for the fourth quarter of 2016-17 under CST rules and to allow revision of returns for the same period under the DVAT Act and Rules. The petitioner's counsel argued that the respondents were not permitting rectification of Form C details as required by Rules 5 & 8 of the Central Sales Tax Delhi Rules. Referring to a previous decision of the Court in HM Sales Corporation Vs Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, the petitioner's counsel emphasized the need for revision in forms, which was granted in that case.

The learned ASC for the respondents admitted that similar issues had arisen in previous cases, such as in the matter of Ritika Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes, which was disposed of by a coordinate bench. The Court referred to previous judgments like Dupont India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, VAT, Delhi, and Ingram Micro India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, where directions were given for issuing F-Forms within a specified timeframe. The Court noted the importance of rectifying mistakes in statutory forms and granted relief to the petitioner in the present case, directing the respondents to release Form-C within two weeks for necessary corrections, subject to the petitioner furnishing a surety bond.

The Court disposed of the writ petition with directions for the release of Form-C to the petitioner within two weeks, allowing for corrections to be made for the relevant quarters. It was specified that the petitioner must provide a surety bond to secure the amounts in question. The directions given were subject to the final outcome in SLP No. 7636/2019. The Court ordered the immediate uploading of the order on the website and directed the forwarding of a copy to the learned counsel via email.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates