Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2021 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (11) TMI 569 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Addition to Long Term Capital Gain by ?16,30,302/-

Analysis:

Issue 1: Addition to Long Term Capital Gain by ?16,30,302/-
The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2013-14 and challenges the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirming the assessment of Long-Term Capital Gain. The appellant contested the addition of ?16,30,302/-, arguing that the correct fair value of cost was inadvertently considered at a wrong amount in the return of income. The appellant also highlighted the quasi-judicial nature of the Assessing Officer's power and cited a circular from the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to support their claim. The appellant further contended that the revised computation of Long-term Capital Gain was not considered by the authorities, emphasizing that it was a correction rather than a new claim of deduction.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the original assessment, citing the appellant's delayed payment of tax and late filing of the return as reasons for precluding the filing of a revised return under section 139(5) of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner referred to relevant case law to support the decision, emphasizing that the legislative intent behind section 139(5) was to limit the benefits of filing a revised return to those who filed within the specified time frames of section 139(1) and (2).

Upon appeal, the ITAT Mumbai considered the issue and noted that the crux of the matter was not the applicability of section 139(5) but rather whether the appellant's claim could be admitted without a revised return. Citing precedents, including a decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the appellant's claim and make a decision in accordance with the law, granting the appellant a proper opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.

In conclusion, the ITAT Mumbai's judgment focused on the procedural aspect of admitting the appellant's claim without a revised return, emphasizing the need for the revenue authorities to consider the claim in line with legal principles and precedents.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates