Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2021 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (12) TMI 940 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of employees' contribution to PF and ESI.
2. Applicability of amendments to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Income Tax Act by Finance Act, 2021.
3. Levying of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Employees' Contribution to PF and ESI:
The primary issue in this appeal is the disallowance of employees' contribution to PF and ESI. The assessee filed the return of income for the assessment year 2018-2019 on 31.10.2018, declaring an income of ?26,62,050. However, the Assessing Officer determined the total income at ?1,99,97,020 under section 143(1) due to the disallowance of ?1,73,34,970 for late remittance of employees' contribution to PF and ESI.

2. Applicability of Amendments to Sections 36(1)(va) and 43B by Finance Act, 2021:
The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, citing that only the employer's contribution to PF and ESI is deductible under section 43B if paid before the due date of filing the return under section 139(1). The CIT(A) also relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in CIT Vs. Gold Coin Health Food Pvt. Ltd., asserting that the amendments to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B by Finance Act, 2021, are clarificatory and have retrospective effect.

The Tribunal, however, disagreed, referencing the Bangalore Bench's decision in M/s. Shakuntala Agarbathi Company Vs. DCIT, which followed the Karnataka High Court's ruling in Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd Vs. DCIT. The High Court had held that the assessee is entitled to the deduction of employees' contribution to PF and ESI if payments are made before the due date of filing the return under section 139(1). The Tribunal further noted that the amendment by Finance Act, 2021, is not clarificatory and does not have retrospective effect. This view was supported by several Tribunal decisions, including Dhabriya Polywood Limited v. ACIT and NCC Limited v. ACIT.

3. Levying of Interest Under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C:
The assessee also contested the levying of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. However, the Tribunal's decision primarily focused on the disallowance issue, and there was no detailed discussion on the interest levied under these sections.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the amendments to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B by Finance Act, 2021, are not retrospective. Therefore, for the assessment year 2018-2019, the assessee is entitled to the deduction of employees' contribution to PF and ESI if paid before the due date of filing the return under section 139(1). The disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal's decision aligns with the Karnataka High Court's ruling in Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd Vs. DCIT and other supporting Tribunal decisions. The order was pronounced on 16th December 2021.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates