Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2021 (12) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (12) TMI 1084 - HC - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
2. Classification of "Primary Agricultural Credit Society" under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and its binding nature on Income Tax authorities.
3. Assessing Officer's authority to probe into the principal objective of providing agricultural credits.
4. Contradiction between ITAT's reliance on the High Court decision in Chirakkal Service Co-op Bank and an earlier case M/s Perinthalmanna Service Co-operative Bank.
5. Limitation of deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) to profits from agricultural activities.
6. Classification of interest income from deposits with banks as "Income from Other Sources" and its eligibility for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i):
The assessee, a Primary Agricultural Credit Society, claimed deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act for income earned from providing credit facilities to its members and from interest on deposits with co-operative banks and treasury. The Assessing Officer rejected these claims, classifying the interest income as "Income from Other Sources." The CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal, however, allowed the deductions, considering the interest income as business income. The High Court, referencing the Supreme Court judgment in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming that the assessee was eligible for the deductions as a registered co-operative society.

2. Classification of "Primary Agricultural Credit Society":
The Revenue questioned whether the classification of the assessee as a "Primary Agricultural Credit Society" under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act was binding on Income Tax authorities for determining eligibility under Section 80P(4). The High Court, following the Supreme Court's decision in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., held that the classification under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act is indeed binding for the purposes of Section 80P(4).

3. Assessing Officer's Authority to Probe Objectives:
The Revenue argued that the Assessing Officer should be able to investigate whether the assessee fulfilled its principal objective of providing agricultural credits. The High Court, referencing the Supreme Court's judgment, concluded that the Assessing Officer's probing into the principal objective was unnecessary as long as the society was registered and engaged in providing credit facilities to its members.

4. Contradiction with Previous Judgments:
The Revenue contended that the ITAT's reliance on the High Court decision in Chirakkal Service Co-op Bank was contradictory to an earlier case, M/s Perinthalmanna Service Co-operative Bank. The High Court, however, upheld the ITAT's reliance on Chirakkal Service Co-op Bank, aligning with the Supreme Court's interpretation in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.

5. Limitation of Deduction to Agricultural Activities:
The Revenue argued that deductions under Section 80P(2)(d) should be limited to profits from agricultural activities, as per the Supreme Court's decision in Sabarkhanta Zilla Kharid Vechan Sangh Ltd. The High Court, however, found that the interest income from investments with co-operative banks and treasury was eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i), provided it was part of the business income earned by providing credit facilities to its members.

6. Classification of Interest Income from Deposits:
The Revenue challenged the classification of interest income from deposits with co-operative banks and treasury as "Income from Other Sources." The High Court, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in M/s. The Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd., held that such interest income should be treated as "Income from Other Sources" and not as business income. However, it allowed deductions under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest earned from investments with co-operative societies, excluding interest from treasury deposits.

Conclusion:
The High Court concluded that the interest income earned by the assessee from deposits with co-operative banks and treasury should be treated as "Income from Other Sources." Deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) were allowed for interest income from co-operative societies but not for interest from treasury deposits. The appeals were allowed, and the Assessing Officer was directed to pass an effect order accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates