Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2022 (2) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (2) TMI 1102 - AAR - GST


Issues involved:
1. Determination of liability to pay tax on services provided.
2. Exemption of services under Goods and Service Tax.
3. Applicability of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017.

Detailed Analysis:
Issue 1: Determination of liability to pay tax on services provided.
The applicant, engaged in providing theme park services, sought an advance ruling on the taxability of services provided by constructing a museum. The applicant claimed that the museum fell under the definition of a museum as per general understanding and should be exempt from GST under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. However, the jurisdictional officer classified the services under SAC 999699, attracting 18% GST. The ruling authority examined the definition of a museum by the International Council of Museum (ICOM) and concluded that the building claimed as a museum was not a non-profit entity but a profit-making venture. As the primary purpose was profit, the services provided were classified under recreational, cultural, and sporting services, attracting 18% GST.

Issue 2: Exemption of services under Goods and Service Tax.
The ruling authority determined that the building claimed as a museum did not meet the criteria of a museum as per the ICOM definition. Therefore, the applicant was not eligible for the exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017. Instead, the services provided by the applicant were classified under recreational, cultural, and sporting services, attracting 18% GST (9% CGST + 9% SGST).

Issue 3: Applicability of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017.
The ruling authority analyzed the relevant provisions of the statute, including the service code for museum and preservation services. They also examined the specific entry in Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017, which exempted services by way of admission to a museum. However, based on the definition of a museum provided by ICOM and the profit motive of the applicant's venture, it was concluded that the applicant's services did not qualify for the exemption under the said notification.

In conclusion, the ruling authority held that the building claimed as a museum was not a museum as per the ICOM definition, and the applicant was liable to pay GST at 18% on the services provided.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates