Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2022 (5) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (5) TMI 386 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
Challenge to assessment order under TNVAT Act for AY 2012-13 | Rectification application pending | Impugned demand notice issued by Revenue | Prayer for Writ of Certiorari

Analysis:
The petitioner, a dealer under the TNVAT Act, challenged an assessment order for the Assessment Year 2012-13, citing an infirmity due to its premature passing before expiry. Subsequently, a rectification application was filed under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act on 21.12.2020. However, despite the pending rectification application, the Revenue issued an impugned demand notice on 03.03.2022, prompting the petitioner to file a writ petition seeking relief.

During the hearing, both parties presented their arguments. The petitioner's counsel emphasized the pending rectification application, while the Additional Government Pleader assured that the application would be considered and disposed of within a stipulated time frame if it remained pending. Considering the submissions, the Court issued the following directives:

1. The respondent was directed to consider the petitioner's rectification application dated 21.12.2020 under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act regarding the assessment order for AY 2012-13 and provide a decision within four weeks from the receipt of the Court's order. The impugned demand notice was to be suspended until the rectification process was completed.

2. It was clarified that based on the outcome of the rectification application, the Revenue would decide the subsequent actions regarding the impugned order.

Ultimately, the Court disposed of the writ petition with the aforementioned orders, emphasizing that no costs were to be incurred. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed as a result of the judgment.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates