Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 1987 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1987 (4) TMI 85 - HC - Customs

Issues:
1. Interpretation of Customs and Central Excise Duties (Drawback) Rules, 1971.
2. Nexus between the duty chargeable at the time of import and the rate of drawback.
3. Revision of drawback rates under Rule 7.
4. Relevance of the price paid to the importer in determining the drawback rate.
5. Legality of refixation of drawback rates and adjustment under Rule 14.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The judgment involves an interpretation of the Customs and Central Excise Duties (Drawback) Rules, 1971. The case revolves around the fixation and revision of drawback rates by the Central Government under the mentioned rules.

2. The main contention is whether there should be a nexus between the duty chargeable at the time of import and the rate of drawback. Petitioners argue that the price paid for imported material should not affect the drawback rate determination. The Central Government's reduction of the drawback rate based on the price paid by the petitioners to the importer is challenged.

3. The issue of the revision of drawback rates under Rule 7 is raised. Petitioners argue that once a rate is fixed under Rule 7, it cannot be revised. Respondents argue that the power of revision exists under Rule 4 and errors can be corrected under Rule 14.

4. The relevance of the price paid to the importer in determining the drawback rate is debated. Petitioners claim that the rate should only be based on the duty paid at the time of import. Respondents argue that the price paid for imported material can influence the quantum of drawback determined.

5. The legality of the refixation of drawback rates and subsequent adjustment under Rule 14 is examined. The court analyzes the power conferred under Rule 14 to revise the amount paid erroneously or in excess. It is concluded that the refixation of drawback rates and adjustment fall within the purview of Rule 14, and the refixation was not illegal.

Overall, the judgment clarifies the interplay between duty charges, price paid for imported material, and the determination of drawback rates under the Customs and Central Excise Duties (Drawback) Rules, 1971. It emphasizes the need for a nexus between duty paid and drawback rates while allowing for revisions under specific rules and the legality of adjustments under Rule 14.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates