Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2022 (5) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (5) TMI 758 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
1. Application for issuance of directions for liquidation to Corporate Debtor under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Extension of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) timeline due to COVID-19 pandemic.
3. Rejection of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) leading to liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.
4. Replacement of the Resolution Professional and appointment of a new Liquidator.
5. Approval for filing a fresh application for liquidation.
6. Appointment of the Liquidator and directions for the liquidation process.

Analysis:
1. The Resolution Professional filed an application under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking directions for the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, M/s. RS Ingot and Billet Private Limited. The CoC, after multiple meetings and discussions, rejected the sole received Resolution Plan, leading to the decision to proceed with liquidation.

2. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent nationwide lockdown, an extension of the CIRP timeline was requested and granted by the Principal Bench, New Delhi, extending the CIRP period from 26.01.2020 to 25.04.2020. The Regulation 40C was inserted to exclude the lockdown period from the CIRP timeline for activities that could not be completed.

3. The CoC, after e-voting, unanimously rejected the Resolution Plan with 100% vote share, prompting the decision to move towards liquidation under the provisions of Section 33 of the IBC, 2016. The Resolution Professional was authorized to file the liquidation application.

4. Subsequently, a new Liquidator, Mr. Debashish Nanda, was appointed to replace the existing Resolution Professional, following a decision made in the 11th CoC meeting. The Resolution Professional's consent to act as the Liquidator was withdrawn, leading to the appointment of Mr. Debashish Nanda as the Liquidator.

5. The Resolution Professional approached the Tribunal for an order of liquidation as no viable resolution plan was received, necessitating the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. The application under Section 33(2) of the IBC was allowed, and liquidation was ordered with specific directions for the process.

6. The Tribunal ordered the appointment of Mr. Debashish Nanda as the Liquidator, directed communication to relevant authorities, ceased the existing moratorium, and initiated a fresh moratorium under Section 33(5) of the IBC. The Liquidator was instructed to proceed with the liquidation process, investigate financial affairs, dispose of pending applications, and submit a Preliminary Report within seventy-five days from the liquidation commencement date.

This comprehensive analysis covers the key issues and detailed proceedings leading to the final order for the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates