Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2022 (5) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (5) TMI 1121 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
1. Transfer of Fixed Deposit and accrued interest.
2. Retention of funds by the Respondent.
3. Claims filed by various creditors.
4. Pendency of garnishee/injunction orders.
5. Application of moratorium under Section 14 of IBC, 2016.
6. Distribution of assets under Section 53 of IBC, 2016.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer of Fixed Deposit and accrued interest:
The Liquidator of M/s. Albanna Engineering (India) Pvt. Ltd. sought directions for the transfer of Rs. 25,13,38,078/- deposited as Fixed Deposit and accrued interest, and Rs. 5,46,08,871.37/- retained by the Respondent to the Liquidator's account for asset distribution under Section 53 of the IBC, 2016. The Tribunal directed the Respondent to transfer these amounts to the Liquidator's account within two weeks.

2. Retention of funds by the Respondent:
The Respondent argued that they had no contractual obligations with the Corporate Debtor or its sub-contractors and that the amounts were attached by various courts through garnishee/injunction orders. The Tribunal noted that the Respondent had retained the amounts under the Tribunal's direction and that the Respondent must transfer the funds to the Liquidator.

3. Claims filed by various creditors:
The Liquidator received claims from secured financial creditors, operational creditors (government claims), and other operational creditors. The total claims amounted to Rs. 78,02,52,535/-. The Tribunal observed that the Corporate Debtor had no liquidation assets other than the amounts in question, which were to be distributed among the claimants.

4. Pendency of garnishee/injunction orders:
The Respondent cited pending garnishee/injunction orders as a reason for not transferring the funds. The Tribunal noted that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC had ceased, and the Liquidator must appear before the civil courts to vacate these orders. The Tribunal also emphasized that the Respondent should inform the civil courts about the moratorium and the Tribunal's orders.

5. Application of moratorium under Section 14 of IBC, 2016:
The Liquidator argued that the moratorium continued during the liquidation stage as per Sections 33(5) and 33(6) of the IBC. The Tribunal agreed that the moratorium had ceased but highlighted that the Liquidator must take steps to vacate the garnishee/injunction orders.

6. Distribution of assets under Section 53 of IBC, 2016:
The Tribunal referred to Section 53 of the IBC, which outlines the order of priority for asset distribution. The Tribunal concluded that the only source of funds for distribution was the Fixed Deposit and retained amounts. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Respondent to transfer these funds to the Liquidator for distribution as per Section 53.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the application, directing the Respondent to transfer the specified amounts to the Liquidator's account for distribution under Section 53 of the IBC, 2016. The Registry was also directed to return the Fixed Deposit receipt to the Respondent for this purpose.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates