Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (8) TMI 27 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Deduction of interest paid for acquiring possession of property.
2. Eligibility for deduction under section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act.

Analysis:
1. The appeal involved a dispute regarding the deduction of interest paid by the Assessee for acquiring possession of a property from a statutory tenant. The Assessee contended that the interest paid should be allowed as a deduction under section 24 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessee argued that the borrowed funds were utilized for acquiring possession of the property, making the interest payment allowable. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the assessing officer disallowed the claim. The Tribunal examined the facts and held that the loan was not borrowed for the specific property in question, as per the loan agreement. The Tribunal emphasized that the property for which deduction was claimed and the property mentioned in the loan document were different. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the Assessee was not eligible for the deduction of interest under section 24 of the Act.

2. The Tribunal referred to relevant legal provisions under section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act, which allow for a deduction of interest payable on borrowed capital for acquiring a property. The Tribunal highlighted that the loan in question was taken for a different property than the one for which the deduction was claimed. Citing precedents and a decision by the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court, the Tribunal held that the Assessee must have borrowed capital for the specific property to be eligible for the deduction. The Tribunal also noted a previous decision against the Assessee in a similar case. Based on these findings, the Tribunal dismissed the Assessee's appeal, ruling that the Assessee was not entitled to the deduction under section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune, consisting of Shri S.S. Godara, Judicial Member, and Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Accountant Member, dismissed the Assessee's appeal regarding the deduction of interest paid for acquiring possession of a property and upheld the decision of the lower authorities to disallow the claim under section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2014-15.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates