Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (9) TMI 1361 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Disallowance of R&D expenses
2. Disallowance of bad debts claimed for late delivery charges deducted by Indian Railways
3. Disallowance of expenses of personal nature

Analysis:

Issue 1 - Disallowance of R&D expenses:
The assessee claimed R&D expenditure as manufacturing expenses, which the AO treated as capital expenditure. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, and the tribunal upheld the decision. The expenses were incurred for technology license fee, marketing services, and technical services, not leading to capital asset augmentation. The tribunal relied on Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, holding the expenses as revenue in nature following the Travancore Sugar and Chemical Ltd. case.

Issue 2 - Disallowance of bad debts for late delivery charges:
The AO disallowed bad debts claimed by the assessee for late delivery charges deducted by Indian Railways. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, stating that the amounts were duly accounted for in the books, and provisions were made for doubtful debts. The tribunal found that the deductions were accounted for, and the recovery from suppliers was considered, leading to dismissal of the revenue's appeal.

Issue 3 - Disallowance of personal expenses:
The AO disallowed expenses on gifts and marriage, terming them as personal in nature. The CIT(A) partially confirmed the disallowance. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision after verifying the details of expenses, declining to interfere with the relief granted. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.

In conclusion, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the additions made by the AO. The judgment provided detailed analysis of each issue, considering the nature of expenses, provisions made, and relevant legal provisions to determine the tax treatment of the disputed amounts.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates