9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (10) TMI 1110 - AT - Income TaxDeduction u/s.80IA(4) - eligible projects undertaken by the assessee - Developer of infrastructure facility v/s contractor - CIT-A granted relief treating that assessee is only a developer of infrastructure facility and not a contractor as alleged by the ld. AO - Recurring issue from past many years - HELD THAT - Projects were duly examined by the ld.CIT(A) with all supporting documents and he had arrived at the conclusion that the assessee is only a developer. No contrary materials were brought on record with supporting evidences by the revenue to controvert this factual findings of the ld. CIT(A) before us. In view of the above observations and respectfully following various orders of this Tribunal in assessee s own case order dated 31/10/2014 and also the decision of the Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of ABG Heavy Industries Pvt. Ltd., 2010 (2) TMI 108 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT we do not find any infirmity in the order of the ld. CIT(A) granting relief to the assessee. Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the CIT(A) was justified in granting deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act for eligible projects undertaken by the assessee. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Justification of Deduction u/s 80IA(4): The primary issue in these appeals is whether the CIT(A) was justified in granting the deduction under section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the infrastructure projects undertaken by the assessee. The assessee, a company involved in developing infrastructure projects such as water supply schemes, road construction, and sewage treatment, claimed deductions for profits attributable to these activities. The AO disallowed these claims, arguing that the assessee acted as a contractor rather than a developer, citing the Memorandum explaining the provisions in the Finance Bill 2007 and previous Tribunal decisions that had mixed outcomes on similar claims. The Tribunal examined the history of the case, noting that for some years, the deduction had been allowed, while for others, it had been denied. The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Pune Tribunal in the case of B.T. Patel & Sons Belgaum Constructions (P) Ltd. vs. CIT, which highlighted the procedural complexities and differing opinions within the Tribunal regarding the eligibility for the deduction under section 80IA(4). The CIT(A) had meticulously examined the agreements and related documents for each project and concluded that the assessee was a developer of infrastructure facilities, not merely a contractor. This conclusion was supported by the retrospective amendment brought by the Finance Act 2009 and the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of ABG Heavy Industries Ltd., which granted similar deductions. The Tribunal found no contrary evidence presented by the Revenue to dispute the CIT(A)'s findings. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to grant the deduction under section 80IA(4) for the assessment years in question, following the precedent set by the jurisdictional High Court and previous Tribunal decisions in the assessee's favor. Conclusion: The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, affirming the CIT(A)'s orders granting the deduction under section 80IA(4) for the assessment years 2014-15 to 2017-18. The Tribunal's decision was pronounced on 26/10/2022.
|
