Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2022 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (11) TMI 569 - HC - Customs


Issues: Challenge to Press Release dated 03.06.2022; Maintainability of the Writ Petition; Investigation under Customs Act, 1962; Issuance of Show Cause Notice under Section 124 of the Act; Difficulty faced by petitioners in arriving in India; Preservation of CCTV footage; Videographing of investigation; Supply of copies of recordings.

Challenge to Press Release dated 03.06.2022:
The Writ Petition challenged a Press Release dated 03.06.2022 regarding the seizure of 9.02 Kgs of gold bars valued at Rs.4.21 Crores by Chennai Air Customs. The petition raised concerns about the seizure made from the lavatory of a flight arriving from Dubai. The Court noted that the Press Release indicated ongoing investigations, rendering the challenge to it infructuous. Consequently, the Writ Petition was closed with no costs.

Maintainability of the Writ Petition:
Initially, the matter was examined for maintainability, and the respondents did not object to it. The respondents' counsels accepted notice and sought time to file counters. The Court directed the preservation of CCTV footage and listed the matter for further proceedings. Eventually, after completion of pleadings, the Court found the Writ Petition challenging the Press Release to be closed due to the ongoing investigations.

Investigation under Customs Act, 1962 and Issuance of Show Cause Notice under Section 124:
During the proceedings, it was highlighted that customs authorities were investigating the gold seizure and intended to issue a show cause notice under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962. The respondents assured the Court that the investigation would be completed within the statutory timeframe, and the necessary notice would be issued. The petitioners were informed that their presence might be required during the investigation, and summons would be issued accordingly.

Difficulty faced by petitioners in arriving in India:
The petitioners expressed difficulties in arriving in India due to a ban on their entry. The respondents claimed no knowledge of such a ban and assured the Court that necessary steps would be taken to facilitate the petitioners' arrival if required for the investigation process.

Preservation of CCTV footage and Videographing of Investigation:
The Court reiterated its earlier order directing the preservation of CCTV footage related to the seizures and the movement of the petitioners within the Terminal. It was mandated that the investigation be conducted in accordance with the law and videographed. The recordings were to be retained until the conclusion of all proceedings, including any appeals or revisions.

Supply of copies of recordings:
The petitioners were granted the liberty to request copies of the CCTV footage and recordings made by the Customs Authorities. Any such copies requested would be provided upon payment of necessary charges. This provision ensured transparency and access to relevant evidence for the petitioners.

In conclusion, the judgment addressed the various issues raised in the Writ Petition, focusing on the legality of the gold seizure, the conduct of the investigation under the Customs Act, the petitioners' potential involvement, and the preservation and access to crucial evidence through CCTV footage and recordings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates