Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (1) TMI 825 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Reopening of assessment beyond four years.
2. Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act.
3. Treatment of the assessee as a cooperative bank.
4. Deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
5. Disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) and their inclusion in the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
6. Applicability of Section 80P(4) to cooperative societies.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years:
The appellant contended that the reopening of the assessment beyond four years was without jurisdiction since there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts. The tribunal did not specifically address this issue in the judgment, focusing instead on the substantive tax deductions under dispute.

2. Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and Section 80P(4):
The tribunal examined whether the assessee, a cooperative credit society, was entitled to deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The CIT(A) had disallowed these deductions by invoking Section 80P(4), which applies to cooperative banks. The tribunal referenced the case of The KEM Hospital & Sheth GSM College Employees Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd., concluding that the assessee, not being a primary cooperative bank, was not subject to Section 80P(4). The tribunal upheld that the assessee was entitled to deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

3. Treatment of the Assessee as a Cooperative Bank:
The CIT(A) treated the assessee as a cooperative bank, thus denying deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The tribunal found this treatment incorrect, emphasizing that the assessee, a cooperative credit society, did not undertake banking business activities and was not authorized by the Reserve Bank of India to operate as a cooperative bank. Consequently, the tribunal ruled that the assessee should not be treated as a cooperative bank and was eligible for deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

4. Deduction under Section 80P(2)(d):
The tribunal considered whether the interest income earned by the cooperative society from investments with cooperative banks was deductible under Section 80P(2)(d). The CIT(A) had disallowed these deductions. However, the tribunal referenced several cases, including the Palm Court M Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., and concluded that the interest income from cooperative banks was indeed eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The tribunal emphasized that cooperative banks, despite the insertion of Section 80P(4), remain cooperative societies, and thus, the interest income derived from them qualifies for the deduction.

5. Disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) and Their Inclusion in the Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i):
The assessee argued that disallowances made under Section 40(a)(ia) should be included in the quantum of deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The tribunal did not provide a specific ruling on this argument, focusing instead on the broader eligibility for deductions under Section 80P.

6. Applicability of Section 80P(4) to Cooperative Societies:
The tribunal reiterated that Section 80P(4) applies only to cooperative banks and not to cooperative societies that are not banks. This interpretation was supported by previous tribunal decisions and the Hon'ble Bombay High Court's ruling in Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax. The tribunal concluded that the assessee, being a cooperative credit society, was not affected by Section 80P(4) and was entitled to deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and Section 80P(2)(d).

Conclusion:
The tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, granting the deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and Section 80P(2)(d), and ruled that the assessee was not a cooperative bank subject to Section 80P(4). The CIT(A)'s disallowances were overturned, and the tribunal's decision was pronounced on 17.01.2023.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates