9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
The issues involved in this case are: 1. Validity of the order confiscating the goods. 2. Validity of the order imposing penalty. 3. Failure to give option to the appellants for redeeming the goods on payment of such fine as may be determined by the Collector of Customs in lieu of confiscation. Validity of the Order Confiscating the Goods: The Supreme Court found that the order directing confiscation of the goods was deemed unassailable in facts or in law. The Collector of Customs had the discretion to give an option to the importers to pay a fine in lieu of confiscation, as per Section 125(1) of the Customs Act. The Additional Collector of Customs, who initially passed the order for absolute confiscation, did not address this aspect in his order. Therefore, the Court directed that the matter be remitted to the Collector of Customs to consider giving the importers an option to redeem the confiscated goods on payment of an appropriate fine, not exceeding the full market value of the goods. Validity of the Order Imposing Penalty: The Court upheld the order imposing penalty, stating that it was justified by facts and warranted by law. Failure to Give Option for Redeeming the Goods: The Court acknowledged the appellants' contention that the Collector of Customs failed to provide them with the option to redeem the goods on payment of a fine. It was noted that the Additional Collector of Customs had the discretion to give such an option, which was not exercised in this case. Therefore, the Court directed that the order be modified to allow the importers to have the opportunity to pay a fine in lieu of confiscation, after considering all relevant circumstances. In conclusion, the appeals were dismissed, subject to the modification allowing the importers to redeem the confiscated goods on payment of an appropriate fine. The concerned officer was directed to make a decision on this matter after hearing the appellants, taking into account all relevant circumstances.
|
